Definition
When a positive confirmation goes unanswered after follow-up, AU-C 505 requires the auditor to perform alternative procedures to obtain relevant and reliable evidence. The procedures must address the same assertion as the confirmation. For receivables that usually means examining subsequent cash receipts and the underlying shipping and sales documents.
Why it matters in an audit or review
A nonresponse is not evidence of accuracy. Without a substitute test, the assertion goes unsupported. If the auditor decided a positive confirmation was needed to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence, alternative procedures may not supply it, and the auditor considers the effect on the audit and the opinion. If management refuses to allow a confirmation and the refusal is not justified, the auditor must consider the effect on the audit and on fraud risk, and communicate with those charged with governance.
Example
Six of 25 positive receivable confirmations (illustrative) are unanswered after a second request. For five, the auditor agrees January cash receipts to the bank statement and matches them to invoice numbers, which cover the balance. For the sixth, no payment has been received, so the auditor inspects the contract, shipping record and signed delivery receipt.
Common mistakes
- Using only the invoice copy, which management produced.
- Applying an alternative that tests a different assertion.
- Not following up first.
FAQ
Can subsequent receipts alone cover existence?
Often, if the cash is applied to the specific invoices. Not for valuation or rights without other work.
Sources
- AICPA, AU-C Section 505, External Confirmations
- AICPA, SAS No. 150, External Confirmations (amends AU-C 330 and 505; periods ending on or after December 15, 2028)
- AICPA, AU-C Section 500, Audit Evidence
Definitions paraphrase AICPA and FASB guidance; read the standard itself before relying on a requirement. Example figures are illustrative. This page is guidance, not professional advice. Report an error