Glossary/Audit procedures

Audit file assembly

Audit file assembly is the administrative closing of the engagement file after the report date, which under AU-C 230 should happen no later than 60 days after the report release date.

CORAA TeamUpdated November 5, 2026

Definition

After the report is released, the team completes the assembly of the final audit file. This includes organizing documents, cross-referencing, deleting or archiving superseded drafts, signing off review notes and recording the date of completion. AU-C 230 sets the assembly period at not more than 60 days after the report release date. The work is administrative; it is not a time to add new audit evidence or change conclusions.

Why it matters in an audit or review

Once assembled, documentation must not be deleted or discarded before the end of its retention period, which AU-C 230 puts at no less than five years from the report release date. Any later change must record the reason, the date and who made it.

Example

The report is released on April 15 (illustrative). The 60-day limit falls on June 14, and the senior sets the assembly date for May 20. The manager confirms that every review note is cleared and every PBC item is filed, then signs the archive checklist. On June 3, a missing confirmation is found, which is added with a note explaining when and why.

Common mistakes

  • Changing files after assembly without recording the change.
  • Leaving unresolved review notes in the archived file.

FAQ

Does the window start at the report date or the release date?

AU-C 230 counts from the report release date, which is the date the auditor grants permission to use the report.

Sources

  • AICPA, AU-C Section 230, Audit Documentation (documentation completion date, retention)

Definitions paraphrase AICPA and FASB guidance; read the standard itself before relying on a requirement. Example figures are illustrative. This page is guidance, not professional advice. Report an error

Standards

AU-C 230

Related terms

  • Audit documentation
    Audit documentation is the record of the procedures performed, evidence obtained and conclusions reached, written so an experienced auditor with no prior connection to the engagement can understand the work.
  • Working paper
    A working paper is a page or file in the audit documentation that records one piece of work: its purpose, source, procedure, results and the conclusion, with the preparer and reviewer identified.
  • Engagement quality review
    An engagement quality review is an objective evaluation, performed by a qualified person who is not on the engagement team, of significant judgments made and conclusions reached before the report is released.
  • Lead schedule
    A lead schedule summarizes the accounts that make up a financial statement line item, agreeing the trial balance to the supporting detail and showing adjustments from prior year to final balance.

Go deeper

All glossary terms →

For US CPA firms

Join the CORAA waitlist

CORAA AI drafts audit working papers from your client’s QuickBooks books and does the first pass: lead schedules, tie-out, memos, draft notes and letters. CORAA Network reviewers clear every finding. Your firm reviews and signs.

  • First audit free, so you can judge the quality on a real file
  • Flat fee by entity size; messy books included
  • We work only with CPA firms, never their clients
See how it works →

* required