Glossary/Government, nonprofit and ERISA

Conditional vs unconditional contributions

An unconditional contribution is recognized when promised, while a conditional one, with a barrier and a right of return or release, is recognized only when the barrier is overcome under ASC 958-605.

CORAA TeamUpdated November 5, 2026

Definition

Under ASC 958-605, as clarified by ASU 2018-08, a contribution is conditional if the agreement includes both a barrier the recipient must overcome (such as meeting a measurable performance target, a matching requirement, or limited discretion over how to spend) and a right of return of assets transferred or a right of release of the donor's obligation. Conditional promises are not recognized until the barrier is met. Unconditional promises are recognized as revenue when made, at fair value, and classified with or without donor restrictions.

Why it matters in an audit or review

The classification determines when revenue is recognized and whether a receivable is reported. Auditors read grant agreements and evaluate barriers. Cost-reimbursement awards, including many federal awards, often carry a barrier (incurring allowable costs) and a right of release, which makes them conditional. Cash received on conditional awards is a refundable advance.

Example

(Illustrative) A foundation promises $200,000 payable only if the organization raises $200,000 in matching gifts, and may withdraw if not met. The promise is conditional. Cash received of $50,000 is recorded as a refundable advance.

Dr Cash 50,000 Cr Refundable advance 50,000

Common mistakes

  • Recognizing the full grant at signing.
  • Treating a reporting requirement alone as a barrier.

Sources

  • FASB ASC 958-605-25, Not-for-Profit Entities, Revenue Recognition, Contributions (conditional and unconditional)
  • FASB ASC 958-605-55, indicators of a barrier
  • FASB ASU 2018-08, Clarifying the Scope and the Accounting Guidance for Contributions Received and Contributions Made

Definitions paraphrase AICPA and FASB guidance; read the standard itself before relying on a requirement. Example figures are illustrative. This page is guidance, not professional advice. Report an error

Standards

ASC 958-605ASU 2018-08

Related terms

  • Net assets with and without donor restrictions
    Nonprofits report two net asset classes under ASC 958, with donor restrictions and without donor restrictions, based on whether a donor imposed a purpose or time limit on use of the resources.
  • Functional expense allocation
    Functional expense allocation assigns costs to program services, management and general, and fundraising, using a consistent, documented method, with all nonprofits presenting expenses by function and nature.
  • SEFA
    The SEFA, or schedule of expenditures of federal awards, is the management-prepared schedule listing each federal program's expenditures, which is audited in relation to the financial statements in a single audit.

Go deeper

All glossary terms →

For US CPA firms

Join the CORAA waitlist

CORAA AI drafts audit working papers from your client’s QuickBooks books and does the first pass: lead schedules, tie-out, memos, draft notes and letters. CORAA Network reviewers clear every finding. Your firm reviews and signs.

  • First audit free, so you can judge the quality on a real file
  • Flat fee by entity size; messy books included
  • We work only with CPA firms, never their clients
See how it works →

* required