Glossary/Audit procedures

Cutoff bank statement

A cutoff bank statement is a bank statement covering a short period after year end, sent directly to the auditor, used to test reconciling items such as deposits in transit and outstanding checks.

CORAA TeamUpdated November 5, 2026

Definition

The auditor asks the bank to send a statement, with check images where available, covering a period after the balance sheet date, commonly one to four weeks, directly to the auditor rather than the client. It is compared with the client's year-end reconciliation to see which items cleared, and when.

Why it matters in an audit or review

It is independent evidence that outstanding checks were truly outstanding and deposits in transit were truly in transit. A deposit in transit that appears at the bank two weeks later may signal window dressing or lapping. An outstanding check that clears before year end means the reconciliation is misstated.

Example

At December 31 (illustrative), the client lists 18 outstanding checks, $31,700. The January 1 to 10 cutoff statement shows 14 clearing for $27,900. The auditor inspects the four remaining items, $3,800, which are all dated December 29 and 30 with no later clearing, and examines the invoices for them. One deposit in transit of $5,100 cleared on January 9, so the auditor asks why it took that long.

Common mistakes

  • Letting the client request or receive the statement.
  • Relying on an online screenshot the client printed.
  • Not checking the statement covers a later date than the reconciliation items require.

FAQ

Does a cutoff statement replace the bank confirmation?

No. The confirmation verifies the year-end balance. The cutoff statement tests reconciling items.

Sources

  • AICPA, AU-C Section 505, External Confirmations (confirmation of the year-end bank balance)
  • AICPA, AU-C Section 330, Performing Audit Procedures in Response to Assessed Risks
  • AICPA, AU-C Section 500, Audit Evidence (reliability of evidence obtained directly from an external source)
  • Cutoff bank statements are an audit practice technique; the AU-C sections above govern the evidence they support

Definitions paraphrase AICPA and FASB guidance; read the standard itself before relying on a requirement. Example figures are illustrative. This page is guidance, not professional advice. Report an error

Standards

AU-C 330AU-C 505

Related terms

  • Bank reconciliation review
    A bank reconciliation review tests the client's year-end reconciliation by agreeing balances to the bank confirmation and the ledger, and testing deposits in transit, outstanding checks and other reconciling items.
  • Proof of cash
    A proof of cash reconciles bank and book cash for beginning balance, receipts, disbursements and ending balance across a period, to detect unrecorded items, timing games and misappropriation.
  • Cutoff testing
    Cutoff testing checks that transactions near period end are recorded in the correct period, usually by examining shipping, receiving and invoice dates for items either side of the balance sheet date.
  • Tracing
    Tracing follows a transaction from its source document forward into the accounting records and financial statements, mainly to test for omissions and to support the completeness assertion.

Go deeper

All glossary terms →

For US CPA firms

Join the CORAA waitlist

CORAA AI drafts audit working papers from your client’s QuickBooks books and does the first pass: lead schedules, tie-out, memos, draft notes and letters. CORAA Network reviewers clear every finding. Your firm reviews and signs.

  • First audit free, so you can judge the quality on a real file
  • Flat fee by entity size; messy books included
  • We work only with CPA firms, never their clients
See how it works →

* required