Definition
AU-C 500 defines two forms. Inspecting records or documents includes reading contracts, invoices, minutes, bank statements and system reports. Physically inspecting an asset includes viewing equipment, counting cash or looking at inventory. Both can serve as tests of controls or substantive tests, and vouching is a form of inspection.
Why it matters in an audit or review
Inspection of documents provides evidence of varying reliability depending on source and nature. External original documents carry the most weight. Physical inspection gives reliable evidence of existence, though not necessarily of rights or valuation. Inspecting a cost record does not show the asset is still usable.
Example
For a $7 million manufacturing line (illustrative), the auditor inspects the purchase contract and invoice for cost and the title or lease terms for ownership, then walks the plant to see the equipment is installed and in use. The documents support rights and cost; the walk supports existence and condition.
Common mistakes
- Reading a document for its existence but not its terms, such as side agreements, cancellation rights or dates.
- Relying on a copy when original or direct access is practical.
- Inspecting an asset without matching its serial number or description to the register.
FAQ
Does inspection prove ownership?
Not by itself. Seeing an asset shows it exists. Ownership needs documents such as titles, invoices or agreements.
Sources
- AICPA, AU-C Section 500, Audit Evidence
- AICPA, AU-C Section 330 (tests of controls and substantive procedures)
Definitions paraphrase AICPA and FASB guidance; read the standard itself before relying on a requirement. Example figures are illustrative. This page is guidance, not professional advice. Report an error