Glossary/Risk and controls

Relevant assertion

A relevant assertion is an assertion about a class of transactions, account balance or disclosure for which there is an identified risk of material misstatement, meaning a reasonable possibility of one.

CORAA TeamUpdated November 5, 2026

Definition

SAS 145 defines the term in AU-C 315. An assertion is relevant when a misstatement in it is reasonably possible and would be material. Whether an assertion is relevant is decided before considering controls, based on the nature of the item and its inherent risk factors. A significant class of transactions, balance or disclosure is one with at least one relevant assertion.

Why it matters in an audit or review

Relevance determines the scope of further work. AU-C 330 requires substantive procedures for relevant assertions of significant classes of transactions, account balances and disclosures, whatever the assessed risk. An assertion judged not relevant needs no specific procedures, and the file should show why. Getting the list wrong either wastes time or leaves risks untested.

Example

For a $3 million prepaid expenses balance (illustrative), the auditor concludes that existence and valuation are relevant, because contracts could be cancelled or expired, but that rights is not, since all items are insurance and subscriptions in the entity's name. Procedures then target existence and valuation, and the file records why rights was excluded.

Common mistakes

  • Marking every assertion relevant for every account to be safe.
  • Dropping one by reference to controls, rather than to inherent risk.
  • Not revisiting relevance after a change in the business.

FAQ

Is a relevant assertion the same as a significant risk?

No. A significant risk is a higher-end risk of material misstatement. Relevance only says there is some reasonable possibility.

Sources

  • AICPA, AU-C Section 315, Understanding the Entity and Its Environment and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement (as revised by SAS No. 145) (definitions of relevant assertion and significant class of transactions, account balance or disclosure)
  • AICPA, AU-C Section 330, Performing Audit Procedures in Response to Assessed Risks and Evaluating the Audit Evidence Obtained
  • AICPA, Statement on Auditing Standards No. 145, Understanding the Entity and Its Environment and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement

Definitions paraphrase AICPA and FASB guidance; read the standard itself before relying on a requirement. Example figures are illustrative. This page is guidance, not professional advice. Report an error

Standards

AU-C 315AU-C 330

Related terms

  • Financial statement assertions
    Financial statement assertions are management's implicit claims in the statements, such as occurrence, existence, completeness, rights and obligations, accuracy, valuation, cutoff, classification and presentation, which auditors use to design tests.
  • Risk assessment procedures
    Risk assessment procedures are the audit procedures used to understand the entity and its environment, internal control and applicable framework, in order to identify and assess the risks of material misstatement.
  • Substantive procedures
    Substantive procedures are audit tests designed to detect material misstatements in account balances, transactions and disclosures, made up of tests of details and substantive analytical procedures.
  • Inherent risk
    Inherent risk is the susceptibility of an assertion about a class of transactions, account balance or disclosure to a misstatement that could be material before considering any related controls.

Go deeper

All glossary terms →

For US CPA firms

Join the CORAA waitlist

CORAA AI drafts audit working papers from your client’s QuickBooks books and does the first pass: lead schedules, tie-out, memos, draft notes and letters. CORAA Network reviewers clear every finding. Your firm reviews and signs.

  • First audit free, so you can judge the quality on a real file
  • Flat fee by entity size; messy books included
  • We work only with CPA firms, never their clients
See how it works →

* required