The two-step going concern evaluation
ASC 205-40 puts the evaluation on management. First, consider whether conditions and events, in the aggregate, raise substantial doubt about the ability to meet obligations within one year after issuance. The standard's examples (ASC 205-40-55-2) fall into four groups: negative financial trends, other indications of financial difficulty, internal matters and external matters. Second, if substantial doubt is raised, consider whether management's plans alleviate it, which requires both implementation and mitigation to be probable (ASC 205-40-50-7 and 55-3).
AU-C 570 requires the auditor to evaluate management's assessment, obtain evidence for the plans and the forecast behind them, obtain written representations, and consider the adequacy of the disclosures. When substantial doubt remains, the auditor's report includes a separate section headed "Substantial Doubt About the Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern."
Common questions
What is the going concern assessment period under US GAAP?
Management evaluates whether there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued, or available to be issued (ASC 205-40-50-1).
When does substantial doubt exist?
When conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within that one-year period (ASC 205-40-20, glossary).
Can management’s plans alleviate substantial doubt?
Only if it is probable that the plans will be effectively implemented within the period and probable that they will mitigate the conditions (ASC 205-40-50-7). Typical plans are disposing of assets, borrowing or restructuring debt, reducing or delaying spending and raising equity.
What disclosures are required?
If substantial doubt is alleviated by plans, disclose the conditions, management’s evaluation and the plans (ASC 205-40-50-12). If it is not alleviated, also state that there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern (50-13).
Does this tool give a probability of failure?
No. It organizes the evidence: which conditions exist, which plans meet the two probable tests, and the liquidity figures. The conclusion is a judgment for management and, separately, the auditor under AU-C 570.
Runs in your browser. The figures you type are not sent to CORAA or stored. Check the result against your firm's methodology before relying on it.