Summary of uncorrected misstatements evaluator.

What do these figures come to once the work is shown?

List the misstatements management has not corrected, by line item and type, and see whether they are material on both the iron curtain and rollover methods.

  • Runs in your browser
  • Nothing stored or sent
  • Free, no sign-up
Materiality
Uncorrected misstatements

One row per misstatement. Enter amounts as their effect on pre-tax income: positive overstates income (or net assets), negative understates it. Closing is the misstatement left in this year's closing balance sheet; opening is the uncorrected prior-year amount carried in the opening balance.

DescriptionLine itemTypeClosing (CY)Opening (PY)Iron curtainRollover
$18,500$18,500
$22,000$7,000
$9,400$9,400
$0-$12,000
Net total (excluding clearly trivial)$49,900$22,900
Iron curtain total
$49,900
Gross $49,900
Rollover total
$22,900
Gross $46,900
Larger of the two
$49,900
83% of overall materiality
Watch
Approaching materiality
The aggregate ($49,900) is above performance materiality ($39,000). With undetected misstatement on top, the risk that total misstatement exceeds materiality may no longer be acceptably low. Consider extra procedures or asking management to correct some items (AU-C 450).
How this was worked out
Work shownrecomputed as you type
Iron curtain (per row) = closing misstatement
Rollover (per row) = closing − opening = the misstatement that went through this year's income
Evaluate on both; material if either total ≥ overall materiality ($60,000)
By typeIron curtain
Factual$18,500
Judgmental$22,000
Projected$9,400
By line itemIron curtainRollover
Accounts payable$18,500$18,500
Accrued liabilities$22,000$7,000
Inventory$9,400$9,400
Revenue$0-$12,000

Pre-tax amounts. Offsetting overstatements against understatements in the net total can hide a material misstatement in one line item: compare each line item with any lower materiality set for it, and weigh qualitative factors (a misstatement that turns a loss into a profit, breaks a covenant or hides fraud can be material at any size). The dual approach follows SEC SAB 108; a private-company auditor can apply the same two views.

Evaluating misstatements under AU-C 450

AU-C 450 has the auditor accumulate misstatements identified during the audit, other than those that are clearly trivial, communicate them to management and request correction. For those that remain uncorrected, the auditor determines whether they are material, individually or in aggregate, considering their size and nature and the effect of uncorrected misstatements from prior periods.

This evaluator records each misstatement twice. Iron curtain is the amount left in the closing balance sheet. Rollover is the effect on this year's income: closing misstatement minus the opening misstatement carried from last year. A prior-year cutoff error that reversed this year has no iron-curtain effect but hits current-year income; a judgmental reserve shortfall that has grown for years may look small on rollover and large on iron curtain. Concluding on the larger of the two avoids both blind spots.

If the aggregate approaches materiality, AU-C 450 has the auditor consider whether the overall audit strategy and plan need revising. This tool flags that when the aggregate passes performance materiality, set with the materiality calculator (AU-C 320).

Common questions

What is a summary of uncorrected misstatements?

It is the schedule of misstatements identified during the audit, other than clearly trivial ones, that management has not corrected. AU-C 450 requires the auditor to accumulate them, evaluate whether they are material individually or in aggregate, and include a summary in, or attached to, the management representation letter.

What is the difference between factual, judgmental and projected misstatements?

Factual misstatements are beyond doubt, such as a recording error. Judgmental misstatements are differences between management’s estimate and the auditor’s view of a reasonable estimate. Projected misstatements are the auditor’s best estimate of misstatement in a population, extrapolated from a sample.

What are the iron curtain and rollover methods?

The rollover method measures a misstatement by its effect on the current-year income statement, including the reversal of prior-year misstatements. The iron curtain method measures the misstatement remaining in the year-end balance sheet. SEC SAB 108 requires public companies to consider both (the dual approach); many auditors of private companies apply it too.

When are uncorrected misstatements material?

When, individually or in aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence users’ economic decisions. Compare them with overall materiality and any lower materiality for particular items, and weigh qualitative factors such as covenant breaches, a change from loss to profit, or fraud.

Do prior-year uncorrected misstatements matter?

Yes. AU-C 450 requires the auditor to consider the effect of uncorrected misstatements related to prior periods on the relevant classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures, and on the financial statements as a whole.

Runs in your browser. The figures you type are not sent to CORAA or stored. Check the result against your firm's methodology before relying on it.

Related audit calculators

For US CPA firms

Join the CORAA waitlist

CORAA AI drafts audit working papers from your client’s QuickBooks books and does the first pass: lead schedules, tie-out, memos, draft notes and letters. CORAA Network reviewers clear every finding. Your firm reviews and signs.

  • First audit free, so you can judge the quality on a real file
  • Flat fee by entity size; messy books included
  • We work only with CPA firms, never their clients
See how it works →

* required