Auditing the tax provision: AU-C 540 estimates and AU-C 620 tax specialists

How AU-C 540 shapes risk assessment and testing of tax estimates, when a tax professional is an auditor's specialist under AU-C 620, and what AU-C 9500 adds.

5 min read · CORAA Team
Lesson 13 of 14 · 0 of 14 complete
In this lesson you will
  • Assess inherent risk for tax estimates using the AU-C 540 risk factors
  • Choose among the three AU-C 540 testing approaches for each tax estimate
  • Decide when a tax professional is an auditor's specialist and apply AU-C 620
  • Apply AU-C 9500 to tax accrual documentation and reliance on outside tax opinions

The provision is a set of estimates

Valuation allowances, uncertain tax positions, the interim effective rate and state apportionment are accounting estimates, so AU-C 540 applies. Current tax is more mechanical but still depends on judgments about deductibility.

Risk assessment under AU-C 540

AU-C 540 requires an understanding of how management identifies the need for estimates, the methods, assumptions and data it uses, how it applies specialized skills, and the controls over the process. The standard also requires a review of the outcome of prior-period estimates, such as last year's provision against the filed return and prior uncertain positions against settlements. The retrospective review guide covers how.

AU-C 540 requires the auditor to consider the degree of estimation uncertainty and the degree to which complexity, subjectivity or other inherent risk factors affect method, assumptions, data and the point estimate. A valuation allowance resting on a five-year forecast of a loss-making company is high on subjectivity and uncertainty. A deferred tax rollforward for a profitable domestic company is low. The auditor then decides whether any risk is significant and, if so, to identify the controls that address it and evaluate their design and implementation.

Responses

AU-C 540 requires one or more of three approaches:

  1. Events up to the report date, such as a return filed or an audit settled after year end.
  2. Testing how management made the estimate: evaluate the method, significant assumptions and data. The standard also asks, when applicable, whether management has the intent to carry out specific courses of action and the ability to do so. That is the test for tax-planning strategies and for indefinite reinvestment of foreign earnings.
  3. Developing an auditor's point estimate or range, for example the auditor's own measurement of an uncertain position.

Tax professionals as specialists

AU-C 620 applies to an individual with expertise in a field other than accounting or auditing. The application guidance in AU-C 620 draws the line for taxes: expertise in applying methods of accounting for deferred income tax is accounting expertise, while a specialist in taxation law has expertise in another field and is a specialist under AU-C 620. Analysis of complex or unusual tax compliance issues is a typical example. A firm's own tax partner or staff can be an auditor's internal specialist.

When a specialist is used, the auditor:

  • Evaluates competence, capabilities and objectivity
  • Obtains enough understanding of the field to set scope and evaluate the work
  • Agrees, in writing when appropriate, on scope, roles, communication and confidentiality
  • Evaluates the findings, significant assumptions and methods, and the relevance, completeness and accuracy of significant source data

The auditor keeps sole responsibility for the opinion. See the AU-C 620 guide.

AU-C 9500: tax accrual interpretation

The AU-C 9500 interpretation on the effect of an inability to obtain audit evidence relating to income tax accruals adds three points:

  • If the entity lacks documentation of its tax accrual and denies access to the people who made the judgments, the auditor may be unable to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence. That is a scope limitation that can lead to a qualified opinion or a disclaimer.
  • Audit documentation includes the significant elements of the entity's tax contingency analysis, including a rollforward of material changes, support for the rate reconciliation, intraperiod allocation, valuation allowances and indefinite reversal plans.
  • An opinion from the entity's legal or tax counsel does not, alone, provide sufficient appropriate evidence. The auditor cannot accept a third party's tax analysis without applying the auditor's own tax expertise and knowledge of the business.

Putting it in the program

The income taxes audit program sequences these steps. Get written representations under AU-C 580 on tax positions and planning intent.

Worked example

Planning the provision audit for Granite Peak Outdoor, Inc.

Granite Peak Outdoor has a $2,400,000 gross deferred tax asset, a three-year cumulative pretax loss, no valuation allowance, and a $650,000 uncertain position for a transfer pricing method. Overall materiality is $400,000.

Risk assessment (AU-C 540). The valuation allowance judgment is high on subjectivity and estimation uncertainty: realization depends on a forecast that reverses the loss history. The engagement team assesses a significant risk. The transfer pricing position involves tax law interpretation, so the team needs expertise in taxation law.

Specialist (AU-C 620). The firm's international tax senior manager is engaged as an auditor's internal specialist. The audit senior documents her competence and objectivity, agrees on scope and reporting in a planning memo, and tests the intercompany revenue data she uses for relevance, completeness and accuracy.

Response (AU-C 540).

  • Valuation allowance: test how management made the estimate. Compare the forecast with the last three years of actual results (retrospective review). Management's forecast missed by 30 percent in each prior year. The team challenges the growth assumption and asks management to model the allowance without forecast income. Reversing deferred tax liabilities of $1,100,000, scheduled within the carryforward periods, support $1,100,000 of the asset, implying an allowance of 2,400,000 - 1,100,000 = $1,300,000, above materiality.
  • Transfer pricing: the specialist develops an independent range and compares it to management's measurement.

The $1,300,000 difference is evaluated under AU-C 450 and discussed with those charged with governance.

Self-check

Answer each question before you open the answer.

  1. Is an engagement team member who is expert in ASC 740 deferred tax accounting an auditor's specialist under AU-C 620?

    Show answer

    No. AU-C 620 application guidance treats expertise in applying methods of accounting for deferred income tax as accounting expertise, not a specialist field. A specialist in taxation law is a specialist under AU-C 620.

  2. Which part of the AU-C 540 testing approach addresses whether management intends and is able to carry out a tax-planning strategy?

    Show answer

    Testing how management made the estimate. When applicable, the auditor asks whether management has the intent to carry out specific courses of action and the ability to do so.

  3. The client offers its outside tax counsel's opinion on the adequacy of its tax reserves and asks the auditor to rely on it alone. Is that sufficient?

    Show answer

    No. AU-C 9500 states that counsel's opinion alone does not provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence. It can be useful, but the auditor must apply the auditor's own tax expertise and knowledge of the business.

  4. What must the auditor evaluate about source data used by an auditor's tax specialist?

    Show answer

    Its relevance, completeness and accuracy, when the data is significant to the specialist's work.

Sources

Back to the syllabus

Standards are paraphrased from the primary sources listed above; read the source before relying on a requirement. This lesson is training material, not professional advice. Report an error

For US CPA firms

Join the CORAA waitlist

CORAA AI drafts audit working papers from your client’s QuickBooks books and does the first pass: lead schedules, tie-out, memos, draft notes and letters. CORAA Network reviewers clear every finding. Your firm reviews and signs.

  • First audit free, so you can judge the quality on a real file
  • Flat fee by entity size; messy books included
  • We work only with CPA firms, never their clients
See how it works →

* required