Remediating deficiencies and reporting material weaknesses

Remediation plans, how long a fixed control must run before it counts, year-end conclusions, the adverse ICFR opinion and the communications auditors must make.

4 min read · CORAA Team
Lesson 13 of 14 · 0 of 14 complete
In this lesson you will
  • Build a remediation plan that addresses root cause and allows enough operation to test
  • Determine whether a material weakness is remediated as of year-end
  • Describe how material weaknesses are reported by management and the auditor
  • Identify the written communications required under AS 2201.78 to .80

Remediation starts with root cause

A remediation plan that replaces one reviewer with another fixes a symptom. Before writing actions, agree the root cause with the process owner: missing control, poor design, lack of competence, workload, system limitation, or tone at the top. Then set actions, owners and dates, and the evidence that will show the fix works. Internal audit’s role under Standard 15.2 of the Global Internal Audit Standards is to confirm implementation through inquiry, risk-based follow-up testing and a tracking system, not to design the fix.

When does a fixed control count?

Management’s assessment is as of fiscal year-end (15 U.S.C. 7262(a)). Release 33-8810 says that if all material weaknesses found during the year are remediated by the end of the fiscal year, management may conclude ICFR is effective as of year-end, while considering whether disclosure of the remediated weaknesses is appropriate or required.

"Remediated" means the new or redesigned control has operated long enough to obtain evidence of operating effectiveness. AS 2201.53 says that if new controls achieve the objectives and have been in effect long enough for the auditor to assess design and operating effectiveness, the superseded controls need not be tested. How long is long enough depends on frequency: a daily control can produce a meaningful sample in weeks; a quarterly control replaced in November will have at most one occurrence before year-end. Plan remediation dates backward from year-end with the testing calendar in mind.

If a material weakness remains at year-end

Management cannot conclude ICFR is effective when one or more material weaknesses exist (Release 33-8810). The management report states that ICFR is not effective and discloses the material weakness. The release encourages disclosure that helps investors understand the cause of the weakness and its potential impact, and differentiates among weaknesses by their potential effect on the financial statements.

The auditor, under AS 2201.90, must express an adverse opinion on ICFR if one or more material weaknesses exist, unless there is a scope restriction. AS 2201.91 requires the report to include the definition of a material weakness and a statement that one has been identified, with an identification of the weakness described in management’s assessment. If management’s assessment omits the weakness, the auditor’s report says so.

The officers address the change in their quarterly certifications. 15 U.S.C. 7241(a)(6) requires the certifying officers to indicate whether there were significant changes in internal controls, including corrective actions on significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. Release 33-8810 also points to Item 308(c) of Regulation S-K for disclosure of material changes in ICFR.

Required auditor communications

  • AS 2201.78: communicate all material weaknesses in writing to management and the audit committee before the ICFR report is issued.
  • AS 2201.79: if the auditor concludes audit committee oversight is ineffective, communicate that in writing to the board.
  • AS 2201.80: communicate significant deficiencies in writing to the audit committee, timely and before the report is issued.

A remediation plan that holds up

For each material weakness or significant deficiency, record:

  1. the deficiency and root cause;
  2. actions, owner and target date;
  3. the date the remediated control starts operating;
  4. the testing plan: who tests, sample size under the methodology, and the date results are due;
  5. status reported to the audit committee each quarter.

After year-end

A material weakness reported at year-end stays open until remediated and tested. AS 6115 provides for an engagement in which the auditor reports on whether a previously reported material weakness continues to exist, which some companies use to show progress between annual reports.

Worked example

Racing the calendar at Granger Medical Supply

Continuing lesson 12: Granger Medical Supply concluded that a material weakness over the returns reserve existed at September 30, 2026. Fiscal year-end is December 31.

Remediation actions:

  • New revenue controller starts October 6; quarterly reserve review (REV-22) is redesigned as a monthly review with a documented threshold of $250,000 per assumption change. First operation: October close.
  • Developer production access to the returns system removed October 14; monthly access review added.

Testing calendar: the company methodology requires 2 occurrences of a monthly control to conclude on operating effectiveness of a remediated control. The October and November reviews are performed on time. Internal audit reperforms both in December. No exceptions. The access removal is verified with a system listing on October 31 and the November access review is tested.

Year-end conclusion: both controls operated effectively for a sufficient period before December 31. Management concludes the material weakness was remediated as of year-end and that ICFR is effective, and discusses the Q3 weakness and its remediation in the 10-K after considering Release 33-8810.

Counterfactual: if the new controller had started December 1, only one monthly occurrence would exist at year-end. Management could not meet its own methodology, the material weakness would remain, and an accelerated filer would receive an adverse ICFR opinion under AS 2201.90.

Self-check

Answer each question before you open the answer.

  1. Can management conclude ICFR is effective if a material weakness found in Q2 was fixed in Q3?

    Show answer

    Yes, if the remediated control operated long enough before year-end to show it is effective. Release 33-8810 allows an effective conclusion when all material weaknesses are remediated by year-end, while management considers disclosing them.

  2. What opinion does the auditor give if a material weakness exists at the as-of date?

    Show answer

    An adverse opinion on ICFR, unless there is a restriction on the scope of the engagement (AS 2201.90).

  3. To whom must the auditor communicate significant deficiencies, and how?

    Show answer

    In writing to the audit committee, timely and before the ICFR report is issued (AS 2201.80).

  4. Which certification element covers corrective actions?

    Show answer

    15 U.S.C. 7241(a)(6): the officers indicate whether there were significant changes in internal controls, including corrective actions on significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Sources

Back to the syllabus

Standards are paraphrased from the primary sources listed above; read the source before relying on a requirement. This lesson is training material, not professional advice. Report an error

For US CPA firms

Join the CORAA waitlist

CORAA AI drafts audit working papers from your client’s QuickBooks books and does the first pass: lead schedules, tie-out, memos, draft notes and letters. CORAA Network reviewers clear every finding. Your firm reviews and signs.

  • First audit free, so you can judge the quality on a real file
  • Flat fee by entity size; messy books included
  • We work only with CPA firms, never their clients
See how it works →

* required