Auditee responsibilities, auditor procurement and the cognizant agency

What 2 CFR 200.508 requires the auditee to do, how 200.509 governs auditor selection, and which federal agency oversees the audit under 200.513.

4 min read · CORAA Team
Lesson 2 of 13 · 0 of 13 complete
In this lesson you will
  • List the four auditee responsibilities in 2 CFR 200.508
  • Apply the 200.509 procurement and indirect cost proposal restrictions to auditor selection
  • Identify the cognizant agency for audit or oversight agency for an auditee
  • Recognize the remedies under 200.505 when an auditee fails to obtain an audit

What the auditee owns

2 CFR 200.508 puts four responsibilities on the auditee, not the auditor. The auditee must:

  1. Arrange for the audit under 200.509 and ensure it is properly performed and submitted under 200.512.
  2. Prepare financial statements, including the schedule of expenditures of federal awards (SEFA) under 200.510.
  3. Promptly follow up and take corrective action on audit findings, including preparing the summary schedule of prior audit findings and the corrective action plan under 200.511.
  4. Give the auditor access to personnel, accounts, books, records, supporting documentation and other information needed for the audit.

These responsibilities matter in practice because they frame the engagement letter and management representations. When the auditor drafts the SEFA or the financial statements as a nonaudit service, the auditee still owns them, and the auditor must evaluate the independence implications under GAGAS before accepting. The single audit engagement letter template spells out these responsibilities.

Procuring the auditor

200.509(a) requires the auditee to follow the procurement standards in 200.317 through 200.327 (or the FAR, as applicable) when buying audit services. The request for proposal must make the audit's objectives and scope clear and must ask for a copy of the audit organization's peer review report, which the auditor must provide under GAGAS. Evaluation factors include responsiveness, relevant experience, availability of qualified staff, the results of peer and external quality control reviews, and price.

Two restrictions follow:

  • An auditor who prepares the indirect cost proposal or cost allocation plan may not be selected to perform the audit when the indirect costs recovered by the auditee during the prior year exceed $1 million (200.509(b)). The restriction applies to the base year and every later year the resulting rate or plan is used.
  • Federal auditors may perform all or part of the work if they fully comply with Subpart F (200.509(c)).

Cognizant and oversight agencies

200.513(a) assigns a cognizant agency for audit to every non-federal entity expending more than $50 million a year in federal awards. It is the federal agency providing the largest amount of direct funding as listed on the SEFA, unless OMB designates another. When direct funding is less than 25 percent of total expenditures, the agency with the predominant amount of total funding becomes cognizant. Cognizance is set using direct awards expended in fiscal years ending in 2019 and every fifth year after that. Entities below $50 million have an oversight agency for audit instead.

The cognizant or oversight agency matters to you in three places: it can authorize an extension of the nine-month submission deadline (200.512(a)), it gives technical audit advice, and it coordinates management decisions on findings that cut across agencies.

When the auditee does not comply

If a non-federal entity continues to be unable or unwilling to have an audit conducted, federal agencies and pass-through entities must take appropriate action under 200.339 (200.505). Remedies include withholding payments, disallowing costs, suspending or terminating awards and initiating suspension or debarment. The late submission and remedies guide covers how agencies use these tools.

Common file mistakes

  • The engagement letter is silent on the auditee's SEFA, summary schedule and corrective action plan responsibilities.
  • Nonaudit services such as SEFA preparation are performed with no documented GAGAS independence evaluation.
  • The firm prepared the indirect cost proposal and nobody checked the $1 million recovery test.
  • The planning file does not identify the cognizant or oversight agency, so nobody knows who can grant a deadline extension.
Worked example

Lakeshore Community College: can the firm keep both jobs?

Lakeshore Community College recovered $1.3 million of indirect costs in fiscal 2025 using a rate based on a proposal that Harlow & Pike CPAs prepared in 2023. The college now issues an RFP for its fiscal 2026 single audit and Harlow & Pike wants to bid.

Step 1: Was the indirect cost proposal prepared by the bidder? Yes, in 2023. Step 2: Indirect costs recovered in the prior year: $1.3 million, which exceeds $1 million. Step 3: Is the resulting rate still in use? Yes, it supports fiscal 2026 recoveries.

Conclusion: under 2 CFR 200.509(b) Harlow & Pike may not be selected for the fiscal 2026 audit. If recoveries had been $900,000, the restriction would not apply, but the firm would still evaluate the nonaudit service under the GAGAS independence framework before accepting.

Lakeshore also expends $62 million of federal awards, with 70 percent coming directly from the Department of Education. Expenditures exceed $50 million, so it has a cognizant agency for audit. Cognizance rests on direct awards expended in the base year (fiscal 2024 is the most recent under 200.513(a)(2)); if Education was also the largest direct funder that year, Education is the cognizant agency.

Self-check

Answer each question before you open the answer.

  1. Who prepares the SEFA in a single audit?

    Show answer

    The auditee. 2 CFR 200.508(b) requires the auditee to prepare the financial statements and the SEFA. The auditor may assist as a nonaudit service only after evaluating independence under GAGAS.

  2. What must an auditee request from bidders under 200.509(a)?

    Show answer

    A copy of the audit organization’s peer review report. GAGAS requires the auditor to provide it, and the results of peer and external quality control reviews are an evaluation factor.

  3. An entity expends $40 million in federal awards. Does it have a cognizant agency for audit?

    Show answer

    No. A cognizant agency for audit is required only above $50 million a year (200.513(a)). Below that, the entity has an oversight agency for audit.

Sources

Back to the syllabus

Standards are paraphrased from the primary sources listed above; read the source before relying on a requirement. This lesson is training material, not professional advice. Report an error

For US CPA firms

Join the CORAA waitlist

CORAA AI drafts audit working papers from your client’s QuickBooks books and does the first pass: lead schedules, tie-out, memos, draft notes and letters. CORAA Network reviewers clear every finding. Your firm reviews and signs.

  • First audit free, so you can judge the quality on a real file
  • Flat fee by entity size; messy books included
  • We work only with CPA firms, never their clients
See how it works →

* required