Accounts payable and the search for unrecorded liabilities

Test completeness of payables: subsequent disbursements, unpaid invoices, receiving records, vendor statements, payable confirmations and accrued expenses.

4 min read · CORAA Team
Lesson 7 of 13 · 0 of 13 complete
In this lesson you will
  • Explain why completeness, not existence, drives payables testing
  • Design a search for unrecorded liabilities with a defined population, threshold and window
  • Use vendor statements and zero-balance confirmations to test completeness
  • Evaluate accrued expenses against post-period evidence

Turn the direction around

For assets, the risk is overstatement and you test existence. For liabilities, the main risk is understatement. Management under pressure to show profit or meet a covenant has a reason to leave bills out, and missing items do not show up in a ledger sample. Testing recorded payables proves they exist. It says nothing about the ones not recorded.

So the core procedure starts outside the ledger and looks back in. AU-C 330.18 requires substantive procedures for each relevant assertion of significant accounts, and for payables completeness is the relevant assertion in almost every file.

The search for unrecorded liabilities

The search takes populations that would contain an unrecorded liability and checks whether each item was recorded in the right period.

  1. Subsequent disbursements. Obtain the cash disbursements journal from year-end to as close to the report date as practical. Select payments above a threshold. For each, look at the invoice and receiving or service dates. If the goods or services were received on or before year-end, the liability should be in year-end payables or accruals.
  2. Unpaid invoices. Review invoices received after year-end but not yet paid, and the open invoice file, for the same question.
  3. Receiving records. Trace receiving reports from the last days of the year to recorded payables.
  4. Contracts and commitments. Look for liabilities arising from contracts, legal matters, and board minutes.

Set the threshold relative to performance materiality, and run the window up to near the report date. A search window that ends two weeks after year-end on an audit released in April leaves the largest invoices, which often arrive late, untested.

The search for unrecorded liabilities guide and workpaper give the layout.

Vendor statements and confirmations

Vendor statements are external evidence of what the vendor believes is owed. Reconcile statements for major vendors to the subledger and investigate differences.

Payable confirmations are less common than receivable confirmations but useful for completeness when the request is designed for it. Select vendors by volume of purchases, not by year-end balance, and include vendors with zero or small recorded balances. Ask the vendor to state the balance (a blank request) rather than agree to a figure. A confirmation sent only to the largest recorded balances tests existence, which is rarely the risk. When a payable confirmation goes unanswered, AU-C 505's examples of alternatives are subsequent disbursements and third-party records such as receiving reports and vendor statements. See payable confirmations and vendor statement reconciliations.

Accrued expenses

Accruals are estimates or calculations for goods and services received but not yet invoiced: utilities, professional fees, interest, bonuses, payroll, property taxes. For each material accrual, test the calculation and compare it with the invoice or payment that followed. Compare accrual balances with the prior year and look for expected accruals that are missing, such as an audit fee or a December utility bill. The accrued expenses schedule helps.

Common file findings

  • Search window too short or threshold too high.
  • Subsequent payments reviewed for amount only, without checking the service or receipt date.
  • Payable confirmations sent only to large recorded balances.
  • Accruals agreed to the client's own calculation with no post-period comparison.
Worked example

Search for unrecorded liabilities at Pinecrest Builders Supply, Inc.

Year-end is June 30. The report is expected September 20. Performance materiality is $75,000; the search threshold is $15,000. The team reviews all disbursements over $15,000 from July 1 to September 12 (68 payments, $2,940,000).

Results:

  • 51 payments relate to goods or services received after June 30. No liability at year-end.
  • 15 payments relate to June or earlier and are in the June 30 payables listing.
  • 2 payments are for June services not recorded: a $26,000 freight invoice for June deliveries, and a $48,000 equipment repair completed June 24, invoiced July 20.

Unrecorded liabilities found: $26,000 + $48,000 = $74,000.

The team then projects. Payments between $5,000 and $15,000 total $610,000 and were not tested. Applying the error rate in the tested group ($74,000 / $2,940,000 = about 2.5 percent) to $610,000 gives about $15,000. Known plus projected: about $89,000, which exceeds performance materiality. The team lowers the threshold to $5,000 for the whole search window, tests the added payments, and asks management to record the $74,000.

Self-check

Answer each question before you open the answer.

  1. Why does selecting from the year-end payables listing not test completeness?

    Show answer

    A sample from recorded payables can only show that recorded items are valid. Unrecorded items are not in the listing, so you must start from outside populations such as subsequent payments, unpaid invoices and receiving records.

  2. How should you choose vendors for payable confirmations aimed at completeness?

    Show answer

    By purchase volume, including vendors with zero or small recorded balances, using requests that ask the vendor to state the balance.

  3. A payment on August 3 for $40,000 relates to consulting performed in July. Is it an unrecorded June 30 liability?

    Show answer

    No. The services were performed after year-end, so no obligation existed at June 30. The date of service or receipt decides, not the payment or invoice date.

Sources

Back to the syllabus

Standards are paraphrased from the primary sources listed above; read the source before relying on a requirement. This lesson is training material, not professional advice. Report an error

For US CPA firms

Join the CORAA waitlist

CORAA AI drafts audit working papers from your client’s QuickBooks books and does the first pass: lead schedules, tie-out, memos, draft notes and letters. CORAA Network reviewers clear every finding. Your firm reviews and signs.

  • First audit free, so you can judge the quality on a real file
  • Flat fee by entity size; messy books included
  • We work only with CPA firms, never their clients
See how it works →

* required