IRC 6695 penalties: copies, signatures, PTINs, records, checks and due diligence

The seven procedural preparer penalties in IRC 6695, the inflation-adjusted amounts for returns filed in 2026 and 2027, and the 6107 copy and retention rules.

5 min read · CORAA Team
Lesson 9 of 14 · 0 of 14 complete
In this lesson you will
  • List the failures each subsection of 6695 penalizes
  • Apply the inflation-adjusted amounts for returns filed in 2026 to a fact pattern
  • Explain the 6107 duties to furnish a copy and retain a copy or list for 3 years
  • Identify which 6695 penalties have a reasonable cause exception

The seven subsections

Section 6695 collects procedural penalties that apply per failure, whether or not tax was understated.

Subsection Failure
6695(a) Failure to furnish a copy of the return or claim to the taxpayer as required by 6107(a)
6695(b) Failure to sign the return or claim as required by regulations
6695(c) Failure to furnish an identifying number (the PTIN) as required by 6109(a)(4)
6695(d) Failure to retain a copy or list as required by 6107(b)
6695(e) Failure to file correct information returns required by section 6060
6695(f) Endorsing or negotiating a refund check issued to a taxpayer other than the preparer
6695(g) Failure to meet the due diligence requirements for head of household status and the credits under sections 24, 25A(a)(1) and 32

Section 24 is the child tax credit (including the additional child tax credit and the credit for other dependents), 25A(a)(1) is the American opportunity tax credit, and 32 is the earned income credit. The next-but-one lesson covers the 6695(g) due diligence rules in detail.

Amounts and inflation adjustment

The statute states base amounts ($50 per failure with a $25,000 cap for (a) to (e), and $500 for (f) and (g)), and 6695(h) adjusts them for inflation for returns filed in calendar years after 2014. Use the figures in the IRS inflation adjustment revenue procedure for the year the return is filed, not the statutory base.

Penalty Filed in 2026 (Rev. Proc. 2024-40) Filed in 2027 (Rev. Proc. 2025-32)
6695(a) to (e) $65 per failure, maximum $32,500 $65 per failure, maximum $33,000
6695(f) $650 per check $665 per check
6695(g) $650 per failure $665 per failure

The cap runs per calendar year for (a) to (c) and per return period for (d) and (e). The (f) and (g) penalties have no cap.

Reasonable cause

Subsections (a) through (e) each provide that the penalty does not apply if the failure is due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect. Subsection (f) has an exception for a bank depositing the full check amount into the taxpayer's account. Subsection (g) has no reasonable cause clause in the statute. Treas. Reg. 1.6695-2(d) gives a narrow exception: the preparer's normal office procedures are reasonably designed and routinely followed, and the failure on that return was isolated and inadvertent.

The 6107 duties behind (a) and (d)

Section 6107(a) requires a preparer to furnish a completed copy of the return or claim to the taxpayer no later than the time it is presented for the taxpayer's signature. Section 6107(b) requires the preparer, for the period ending 3 years after the close of the return period, to keep either a completed copy of each return or claim, or a list of the taxpayers' names and taxpayer identification numbers, and to make the copy or list available to the IRS on request.

Signing and the PTIN

The 6695(b) and (c) penalties pair with Circular 230. A signing preparer who leaves the preparer signature off, or omits the PTIN, can face both a 6695 penalty and a Circular 230 inquiry. Tax software fills in the PTIN from the preparer profile, so the common failure is a return filed under the wrong profile.

Check negotiation

Section 6695(f) penalizes a preparer who endorses or negotiates, directly or through an agent, a refund check issued to a taxpayer. The only statutory carve-out is a bank depositing the full amount of the check into the taxpayer's own account at that bank. A preparer who collects fees from a refund never endorses the client's check.

Firm-level controls in the tax season workflow guide cover client copies and retention.

Worked example

A season of missed steps: Lakeside Returns, 2026 filing season

During the 2026 filing season a seasonal preparer at Lakeside Returns prepared 120 returns. A later IRS visit finds:

  • 30 returns where the client never received a copy before signing (6695(a)).
  • 12 returns filed under the office profile with no PTIN for the preparer (6695(c)).
  • 4 returns claiming the earned income credit with no Form 8867 knowledge documentation (6695(g)).

Step 1, 6695(a): 30 failures at $65 = $1,950, well under the $32,500 cap.

Step 2, 6695(c): 12 failures at $65 = $780.

Step 3, 6695(g): each return claimed only the EIC, so 4 failures at $650 = $2,600.

Step 4, reasonable cause: the preparer argues the copies were emailed after signing. Section 6107(a) requires the copy no later than when the return is presented for signature, so a later email does not cure (a). There is no statutory reasonable cause clause for (g).

Total: $1,950 + $780 + $2,600 = $5,330 for returns filed in 2026, before any 6694 exposure.

Conclusion: the due diligence penalty is the largest per failure. Firms should treat Form 8867 documentation as a hard stop before filing.

Self-check

Answer each question before you open the answer.

  1. What is the 6695(c) penalty for failing to furnish a PTIN on a return filed in 2026, and the cap?

    Show answer

    $65 per failure with a maximum of $32,500 per calendar year, per Rev. Proc. 2024-40. The statutory $50 and $25,000 are indexed under 6695(h), so the revenue procedure for the filing year controls.

  2. How long must a preparer keep a copy of a return or a list of clients under 6107(b)?

    Show answer

    For the period ending 3 years after the close of the return period, under 6107(b). The preparer keeps either a completed copy of each return or a list of taxpayer names and identification numbers, and makes it available to the IRS on request.

  3. Which benefits are covered by the 6695(g) due diligence penalty?

    Show answer

    Head of household filing status and the credits under section 24 (child tax credit, additional child tax credit, credit for other dependents), section 25A(a)(1) (American opportunity tax credit) and section 32 (earned income credit). Section 6695(g) lists exactly these, which is why Form 8867 covers the same four benefits.

Sources

Back to the syllabus

Standards are paraphrased from the primary sources listed above; read the source before relying on a requirement. This lesson is training material, not professional advice. Report an error

For US CPA firms

Join the CORAA waitlist

CORAA AI drafts audit working papers from your client’s QuickBooks books and does the first pass: lead schedules, tie-out, memos, draft notes and letters. CORAA Network reviewers clear every finding. Your firm reviews and signs.

  • First audit free, so you can judge the quality on a real file
  • Flat fee by entity size; messy books included
  • We work only with CPA firms, never their clients
See how it works →

* required