Step 1: contract criteria, combination and contract modifications

When a customer arrangement becomes a contract under 606-10-25-1, when two contracts must be combined, and the three ways to account for a modification.

5 min read · CORAA Team
Lesson 2 of 14 · 0 of 14 complete
In this lesson you will
  • Apply the five contract criteria, including the collectibility test as amended by ASU 2016-12
  • Account for consideration received before a contract meets the criteria
  • Determine when contracts entered into at or near the same time must be combined
  • Classify a modification as a separate contract, a prospective change or a cumulative catch-up

The five criteria

Under 606-10-25-1, an entity accounts for a contract with a customer only when all of these are met:

  • The parties have approved the contract (in writing, orally or by customary business practice) and are committed to perform.
  • The entity can identify each party's rights regarding the goods or services.
  • The entity can identify the payment terms.
  • The contract has commercial substance: the risk, timing or amount of future cash flows is expected to change as a result of it.
  • It is probable that the entity will collect substantially all of the consideration to which it will be entitled for the goods or services that will be transferred.

The collectibility test looks only at the customer's ability and intention to pay when amounts are due. ASU 2016-12 added implementation guidance that the assessment considers the entity's ability to mitigate credit risk, for example by stopping service when the customer does not pay. So a monthly service to a weak customer can pass collectibility if the entity will cut off service after one missed payment: the entity is not exposed to credit risk for services it will never provide.

Collectibility is also separate from price concessions. If the entity expects to accept less than the stated price, the difference is variable consideration (a price concession) in step 3, not a collectibility failure.

When the criteria are not met

If the criteria are not met, the entity keeps reassessing (606-10-25-6). Cash received in the meantime is a liability. As amended by ASU 2016-12, 606-10-25-7 permits revenue for that cash only when one of these occurs:

  • the entity has no remaining obligations and has received substantially all of the consideration, which is nonrefundable;
  • the contract has been terminated and the consideration received is nonrefundable; or
  • the entity has transferred control of the goods or services the cash relates to, has stopped transferring goods or services, has no obligation to transfer more, and the cash is nonrefundable.

Contract term

Topic 606 applies to the period in which the parties have present enforceable rights and obligations. A month-to-month arrangement that either party can cancel without penalty is a one-month contract, renewed each month. Read termination clauses before you count a three-year deal as three years of transaction price.

Combining contracts

Under 606-10-25-9, two or more contracts entered into at or near the same time with the same customer (or related parties of the customer) are combined if any one of these is met:

  • they were negotiated as a package with a single commercial objective;
  • the consideration in one contract depends on the price or performance of the other; or
  • the goods or services in the contracts are a single performance obligation.

Splitting a deal into a cheap "product" contract and an expensive "services" contract signed the same week is the classic pattern this rule catches.

Contract modifications

A modification is a change in scope or price (or both) approved by the parties (606-10-25-10). It can be approved orally or by business practice, and it can exist while price is still being disputed. If scope changed but price has not been agreed, estimate the price change as variable consideration.

The accounting follows a decision path:

  1. Separate contract (606-10-25-12). Both conditions: the scope increases by distinct goods or services, and the price increases by an amount that reflects their standalone selling prices (with appropriate adjustments). Account for the add-on as a new contract and leave the original alone.
  2. Termination and new contract, prospective (606-10-25-13(a)). If not a separate contract and the remaining goods or services are distinct from those already transferred, treat the original as terminated. Allocate to the remaining performance obligations the sum of consideration not yet recognized plus the consideration added by the modification.
  3. Cumulative catch-up (606-10-25-13(b)). If the remaining goods or services are not distinct and form part of a single, partially satisfied performance obligation, update the transaction price and measure of progress and book the adjustment to revenue on the modification date.

Mixed modifications use both treatments. The modification memo template walks this path, and the worked entries guide shows the journal entries.

Worked example

A mid-term software services modification

Cedar Analytics contracts to provide 12 months of a data-cleansing service for $120,000 (SSP $10,000 per month). Each month is a distinct service and the months form a series. After 6 months ($60,000 recognized), the customer adds 6 more months for $48,000, a discount because it is a renewal. Cedar's current SSP for 6 months is $60,000.

Separate contract test: scope increases by distinct services, but the $48,000 price does not reflect SSP of $60,000, and the discount is not explained by saved selling costs. Not a separate contract.

Remaining services (12 months) are distinct from the 6 months already delivered, so Cedar applies the termination and new contract approach. Consideration for the new contract: unrecognized $60,000 + added $48,000 = $108,000 over 12 remaining months.

Conclusion: monthly revenue drops from $10,000 to $9,000 from month 7 onward. Nothing is adjusted for months 1 to 6. Had Cedar used the cumulative catch-up approach, it would have wrongly reduced revenue already recognized for completed months.

Self-check

Answer each question before you open the answer.

  1. A customer has weak credit, but the entity will stop service immediately on nonpayment. Can the contract pass the collectibility criterion?

    Show answer

    Yes. Under the ASU 2016-12 guidance, the assessment considers only the consideration for goods or services that will be transferred, and the entity can mitigate credit risk by stopping service. It considers the customer's ability and intention to pay for those services.

  2. Cash is received on an arrangement that fails step 1. When can it become revenue?

    Show answer

    Only when one of the 606-10-25-7 events occurs: no remaining obligations and substantially all consideration received and nonrefundable; the contract is terminated and the cash is nonrefundable; or control of the related goods or services has transferred, transfers have stopped, there is no obligation to transfer more, and the cash is nonrefundable. Until then it is a liability.

  3. Name the three criteria for combining contracts.

    Show answer

    Negotiated as a package with a single commercial objective; consideration in one depends on the price or performance of the other; or the goods or services together form a single performance obligation. Any one is enough, for contracts with the same customer entered into at or near the same time.

  4. When is a modification accounted for with a cumulative catch-up?

    Show answer

    When it is not a separate contract and the remaining goods or services are not distinct, so they form part of a single performance obligation that is partially satisfied at the modification date.

Sources

Back to the syllabus

Standards are paraphrased from the primary sources listed above; read the source before relying on a requirement. This lesson is training material, not professional advice. Report an error

For US CPA firms

Join the CORAA waitlist

CORAA AI drafts audit working papers from your client’s QuickBooks books and does the first pass: lead schedules, tie-out, memos, draft notes and letters. CORAA Network reviewers clear every finding. Your firm reviews and signs.

  • First audit free, so you can judge the quality on a real file
  • Flat fee by entity size; messy books included
  • We work only with CPA firms, never their clients
See how it works →

* required