Definition
The ACFE describes fraud examination as a methodology for resolving fraud allegations from inception to disposition. It begins with predication, meaning facts that would lead a reasonable, trained professional to believe a fraud has occurred, is occurring or will occur. It then moves through evidence collection, document and data analysis, interviews, and a report. Examiners protect the chain of custody and avoid conclusions on guilt.
Why it matters in an audit or review
An auditor who suspects fraud under AU-C 240 communicates with the right level of management and those charged with governance, and considers the effect on the audit. A fraud examination goes further than an audit procedure and is usually performed by a separate team, often through counsel.
Example
Illustrative: payroll analytics flag three employees who share a bank account. Predication exists, so the examiner pulls personnel files, tests the payroll approvals and interviews the payroll supervisor last, after the documents are secured.
Common mistakes
- Interviewing the suspect before securing documents.
- Starting an examination with no predication.
Sources
- ACFE, Fraud Examiners Manual, Investigation section, https://www.acfe.com/FEM
- AICPA, AU-C Section 240, Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit
Definitions paraphrase AICPA and FASB guidance; read the standard itself before relying on a requirement. Example figures are illustrative. This page is guidance, not professional advice. Report an error