Definition
The Occupational Fraud and Abuse Classification System, called the fraud tree, divides fraud committed by people against their employer into three branches. Asset misappropriation covers theft of cash and other assets, including skimming, larceny and fraudulent disbursements such as billing and payroll schemes. Corruption covers conflicts of interest, bribery, illegal gratuities and economic extortion. Financial statement fraud covers intentional misstatement of financial reports, including overstatement or understatement of assets, revenue and expenses.
Why it matters in an audit or review
Auditors consider fraud risk factors under AU-C 240. The tree gives a vocabulary for brainstorming how fraud could occur at the client and for linking each scheme to a test. Revenue recognition and management override are presumed risks in the audit standards, and they fall on the financial statement branch.
Example
Illustrative: during brainstorming, the team lists shell vendor billing under asset misappropriation, kickbacks from a supplier under corruption and early revenue recognition under financial statement fraud. Each gets a different test.
Common mistakes
- Brainstorming only financial statement fraud, which skips asset misappropriation schemes.
- Treating the branches as exclusive. One scheme can involve more than one.
Sources
- ACFE, Occupational Fraud Classification System (Fraud Tree), published with the Report to the Nations, https://www.acfe.com
- AICPA, AU-C Section 240, Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit
Definitions paraphrase AICPA and FASB guidance; read the standard itself before relying on a requirement. Example figures are illustrative. This page is guidance, not professional advice. Report an error