The formulas
- Amount A = performance materiality x your percentage
- Amount B = expected balance x your percentage (optional)
- Threshold = lower of A and B
- Investigate when |recorded - expectation| > threshold
How it works
AU-C 520 paragraph .05 requires the auditor to determine the amount of any difference from the expectation that is acceptable without further investigation. Paragraph .A24 says that amount is influenced by materiality and the desired level of assurance, and that it decreases as assessed risk increases. The standard sets no percentage: the percentages here are your firm's policy.
The threshold only works with an expectation precise enough to detect a difference that size. Paragraph .A22 ties precision to how well the result can be predicted and how far the data can be disaggregated. A threshold smaller than the expectation's own error band flags noise, not misstatement.
Illustrative figures only. Check the result against your firm's methodology before relying on it.
Common questions
Why use the lower of two amounts?
A percentage of performance materiality alone is too loose for small balances. Capping it by a share of the balance keeps the test meaningful for both large and small accounts.
What do I do with a difference over the threshold?
Paragraph .07 of AU-C 520 requires inquiry of management and other procedures to corroborate the explanation.
Should the threshold change with risk?
Yes. Higher assessed risk calls for a smaller acceptable difference, per AU-C 520 .A24.
Sources
- AICPA AU-C Section 520, Analytical Procedures (paragraphs .05, .07 and .A10 to .A24)
- AICPA AU-C Section 320, Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit (definitions of performance materiality and tolerable misstatement)
Runs in your browser. The figures you type are not sent to CORAA or stored. Check the result against your firm's methodology before relying on it.