What a flux analysis is for
A flux analysis compares balances between periods, or against budget, and explains the movements that are big enough to matter. In a financial close it is a review step that catches mispostings, missing accruals and cut-off errors before the numbers are final. For an auditor it is an analytical procedure: at the planning stage it helps identify risks, and near the end of the audit AU-C 520 requires an overall review of the financial statements to see whether they are consistent with the auditor's understanding of the entity (AU-C 520.06).
Thresholds decide which lines get attention. Requiring both a dollar and a percent hit keeps tiny accounts with big percentage swings, and big accounts with small percentage swings, off the list; requiring either is more thorough and noisier. No threshold is universal: set it from materiality or from the entity's own policy. When a management review of variances is a control, the threshold and the evidence of follow-up are what the auditor tests, so keep the explanations specific: cause, amount and support, not "timing" or "higher activity".
Common questions
What is flux analysis?
A line-by-line comparison of two periods, with dollar and percent changes and a written reason for each material movement. The name comes from "fluctuation".
What threshold should I use?
There is no standard figure. Many teams tie the dollar threshold to a share of materiality and add a percent test so small balances are not flooded with flags. Choose one, document it, and apply it consistently from period to period.
What if the prior period balance is zero?
The percent change cannot be computed and shows as n/a. A new balance is treated as meeting the percent test, so whether it is flagged depends on the dollar threshold and your rule.
Should I flag on both thresholds or either?
Both is the usual choice when the aim is to focus on movements that are large in dollars and in proportion. Either is better for a higher-risk review where you would rather over-investigate. The selector lets you compare.
Is a flux review the same as an audit analytical procedure?
They overlap. The auditor's analytical procedures need a documented expectation formed before the comparison (AU-C 520). A close-review flux often compares only to prior period, so use the analytical procedures tool when you need an expectation with a driver.
Runs in your browser. The figures you type are not sent to CORAA or stored. Check the result against your firm's methodology before relying on it.