- Determine whether a state or local tax is within the scope of ASC 740
- Compute a blended state and federal rate with apportionment and the federal deduction
- Apply ASU 2019-12 to franchise taxes partly based on income
- Evaluate how an elective pass-through entity tax is reported by the entity
Scope: taxes based on income
Statement 109 paragraph 4 applies ASC 740 to federal income taxes and to foreign, state and local (including franchise) taxes based on income. A gross receipts tax, a sales tax or a property tax is not an income tax and is accounted for as an operating expense. The test is the tax base, not the label the state gives the tax.
ASU 2019-12 addressed taxes that combine the two. Under ASC 740-10-15-4(a) as amended, if a franchise tax (or similar tax) is partially based on income, such as a tax equal to the greater of an income-based amount and a capital-based amount:
- Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized and measured at the applicable statutory income tax rate.
- The entity does not consider the effect of possibly paying the non-income-based tax in future years when assessing realizability.
- Current tax expense equal to the income-based amount is an income tax; any incremental amount is a non-income-based tax.
Measuring state deferred taxes
Statement 109 paragraph 17 requires deferred taxes by tax-paying component in each jurisdiction, and paragraph 18 uses the enacted rate expected to apply when the difference reverses. For states, that means:
- Each state's rate times the apportionment percentage the entity expects in the reversal years, not just this year's.
- Separate-return states and unitary combined-report states measured by the group that actually files.
- State loss carryforwards tracked by state, with each state's carryforward period and any limits.
State income taxes are deductible for federal purposes, so a state deferred tax asset or liability has a federal effect. The common shortcut is a blended rate: state rate + federal rate x (1 - state rate).
In the rate reconciliation, ASU 2023-09 requires a PBE to present state and local income tax, net of federal (national) income tax effect as one category, and to describe the states making up more than 50 percent of it. The rate reconciliation lesson has the details.
Pass-through entity taxes
Many states let a partnership or S corporation elect to pay state income tax at the entity level. IRS Notice 2020-75 announced that the Treasury and the IRS intend to issue proposed regulations clarifying that state and local income taxes imposed on and paid by a partnership or S corporation on its income are deductible by the entity in computing its non-separately stated income or loss for the year of payment. That is why owners favor the election.
For the entity's own GAAP statements, apply the scope test:
- If state law imposes the tax on the entity and the entity is the taxpayer, it is an income tax of the entity under ASC 740. Record current tax expense, and evaluate deferred taxes on the state's temporary differences for the years the entity expects to be subject to the tax.
- If the entity is paying a liability that belongs to its owners (for example, a withholding on their behalf), the payment is a distribution or a receivable from owners, not tax expense.
Because most elections are made year by year, ask management whether it expects to elect in the years temporary differences reverse, and document the basis. The PTET standard page summarizes state regimes.
Single-member and disregarded entities
ASU 2019-12 also says an entity is not required to allocate consolidated current and deferred tax expense to a legal entity that is not subject to tax in its separate statements. It may elect to do so, entity by entity, for a legal entity that is both not subject to tax and disregarded by the taxing authority.
Audit focus
Check that apportionment factors used for deferred taxes were reconsidered this year, that each state's rate is enacted, and that the federal benefit of state taxes is computed once, not twice. The nexus guide helps when the question is whether the entity files in a state at all.
Blended rate for Summit Ridge Logistics, Inc.
Summit Ridge Logistics has taxable income before state taxes of $10,000,000, apportioned 60 percent to State A (6 percent rate) and 40 percent to State B (8 percent rate). There are no permanent differences.
State tax:
- State A: 10,000,000 x 60% x 6% = $360,000
- State B: 10,000,000 x 40% x 8% = $320,000
- Total: $680,000 (6.8 percent of income)
Federal tax: (10,000,000 - 680,000) x 21% = 9,320,000 x 21% = $1,957,200.
Total tax: 680,000 + 1,957,200 = $2,637,200, or 26.372 percent.
Rate reconciliation:
- Federal statutory: 10,000,000 x 21% = $2,100,000
- State, net of federal effect: 680,000 x (1 - 21%) = $537,200
- Total: $2,637,200
Blended deferred rate, assuming the same apportionment in reversal years: 6.8% + 21% x (1 - 6.8%) = 6.8% + 19.572% = 26.372 percent. A $1,000,000 taxable temporary difference produces a deferred tax liability of $263,720.
If Summit Ridge expects apportionment to shift to 50/50 when the difference reverses, the state rate becomes 7 percent and the blended rate becomes 7% + 21% x 93% = 26.53 percent. The deferred tax liability uses the expected factors.
Self-check
Answer each question before you open the answer.
Is a state gross receipts tax accounted for under ASC 740?
Show answer
No. ASC 740 applies to taxes based on income. A tax on gross receipts is not based on income, so it is an operating expense.
A state franchise tax is the greater of an income-based tax and a capital-based tax. How is it accounted for after ASU 2019-12?
Show answer
The income-based portion is an income tax with deferred taxes measured at the statutory income tax rate, and any incremental amount paid because the capital-based tax is higher is a non-income-based tax (ASC 740-10-15-4(a)).
Why does a $100 state tax not increase total tax expense by $100?
Show answer
State income taxes are deductible for federal purposes, so a $100 state tax reduces federal tax by $21 at a 21 percent rate. The net effect is $79, which is why the rate reconciliation shows state tax net of the federal effect.
What did IRS Notice 2020-75 say about entity-level state income taxes paid by a partnership?
Show answer
That the Treasury and IRS intend to issue proposed regulations clarifying that state and local income taxes imposed on and paid by a partnership or S corporation on its income are deductible by the entity in computing non-separately stated income for the year of payment.
Use it on the file
- StandardNotice 2020-75: Pass-Through Entity Tax (PTET): The SALT Workaround, Notice 2020-75 and the Accounting
- ToolIncome Tax Rate Reconciliation Calculator (ASC 740, ASU 2023-09)
- StandardSouth Dakota v. Wayfair: State Economic Nexus After Wayfair: Sales Tax Exposure and the ASC 450 Accrual
- TemplateIncome Tax Provision Workbook (ASC 740)
Sources
- FASB, Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (original pronouncement, now ASC 740)
- FASB, ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes
- IRS Notice 2020-75, Deductibility of Payments by Partnerships and S Corporations for Certain State and Local Income Taxes
- FASB, ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures
Standards are paraphrased from the primary sources listed above; read the source before relying on a requirement. This lesson is training material, not professional advice. Report an error