CORAA
Resources · Regulatory enforcement

NFRA Enforcement Tracker.

Every public NFRA (National Financial Reporting Authority) enforcement order against Indian auditors and audit firms from 2022 through May 2026. Each entry shows the audited entity, audit firm, financial year, penalty amount, debarment, root cause and Standards on Auditing cited. Sourced from official NFRA orders on nfra.gov.in and contemporaneous news coverage.

2025-26 update
In February 2025 the Delhi High Court ruled against NFRA on procedural grounds (separation of investigation and adjudication functions). In March 2025 the Supreme Court partly restored NFRA’s authority but stayed final orders pending review. Only one disciplinary order has been issued in calendar 2025 (Religare Finvest, January 2025). The Corporate Laws Amendment Bill 2026 proposes to expand NFRA powers.
19
verified orders in this tracker
94+
total NFRA disciplinary orders by 2025 (NFRA Annual Report)
₹10 cr
largest firm-level penalty (BSR / Coffee Day, Aug 2024)
10 yrs
longest individual debarment imposed
Tracker covers verified orders; not exhaustive. NFRA reports 94 total disciplinary orders by 2025 affecting 19 audit firms and 84 CAs. Refer the NFRA Annual Report 2024-25 (published 8 December 2025) for the authoritative aggregate.

2025

1 order
Religare Finvest Ltd
2025-01-30
Auditor
CA Neeraj Bansal
FY audited
FY 2017-18
Individual penalties
₹5 lakh
Debarment
5 years
Root cause (NFRA finding)
Delay in reporting ₹2,036 cr fraud in Corporate Loan Book under Section 143(12); improper evaluation of ₹495.63 cr Deferred Tax Assets; failure to scrutinise ₹200 cr NCD investment in OSPL Infradel.
Standards cited
SA 240SA 540SA 500Section 143(12) Companies Act 2013
Order source →

2024

12 orders
Coffee Day Enterprises Ltd (CDEL)
2024-08-19
Auditor
M/s BSR & Associates LLP (KPMG-affiliated)
Named individuals
CA Aravind Maiya (EP), CA Amit Somani (EQCR)
FY audited
FY 2018-19
Firm penalty
₹10 crore (largest-ever firm penalty by NFRA)
Individual penalties
₹50 lakh on Maiya · ₹25 lakh on Somani
Debarment
Maiya 10 years · Somani 5 years
Root cause (NFRA finding)
Failure to investigate ₹3,535 cr fund diversion to MACEL (promoter entity); over-reliance on subsidiary auditors; failure to verify related-party loans and advances.
Standards cited
Order source →
Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd (ZEEL)
2024-12-23
Auditor
Deloitte Haskins & Sells LLP
Named individuals
CA A.B. Jani (EP), CA Rakesh Sharma (EQCR)
FY audited
FY 2018-19 + 2019-20
Firm penalty
₹2 crore
Individual penalties
₹10 lakh on Jani · ₹5 lakh on Sharma
Debarment
Jani 5 years · Sharma 3 years
Root cause (NFRA finding)
Failure to evaluate ₹200 cr FD pledged as guarantee for promoter-group company without board / shareholder approval; failure to report suspected fraud; ignored red flags on related-party transactions.
Standards cited
Order source →
Reliance Capital Ltd
2024-04-12
Auditor
M/s Pathak H.D. & Associates
Named individuals
CA Parimal Kumar Jha (EP), CA Vishal D. Shah (EQCR)
FY audited
FY 2018-19
Firm penalty
₹3 crore
Individual penalties
₹1 crore on Jha · ₹50 lakh on Shah
Debarment
Jha 10 years · Shah 5 years
Root cause (NFRA finding)
Failed to act on Price Waterhouse's reported suspected fraud of ~₹12,571 cr loans and investments to group companies. Bias and lack of professional skepticism.
Standards cited
Order source →
Reliance Home Finance Ltd (RHFL)
2024-04-26
Auditor
M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj
Named individuals
CA Piyush Patni (EP), CA Pawan Kumar Gupta (EQCR)
FY audited
FY 2018-19
Firm penalty
₹1 crore
Individual penalties
₹50 lakh on Patni · ₹10 lakh on Gupta
Debarment
Patni 5 years · Gupta 3 years
Root cause (NFRA finding)
Failed to assess risk of material misstatement on ~₹7,900 cr GPCL loans to financially weak group companies without business rationale; Price Waterhouse had resigned flagging fraud.
Standards cited
Order source →
Reliance Commercial Finance Ltd (RCFL)
2024-05-16
Auditor
M/s Shridhar & Associates
Named individuals
CA Ajay Vastani (EP)
FY audited
FY 2018-19
Firm penalty
₹2 crore
Individual penalties
₹50 lakh on Vastani
Debarment
Vastani 5 years
Root cause (NFRA finding)
Price Waterhouse reported suspected fraud of ~₹8,600 cr working-capital / SME loans and undisclosed related-party transactions. Inadequate credit-loss provisions, insufficient risk assessment.
Standards cited
Order source →
Seya Industries Ltd
2024-01-05
Auditor
M/s Anil Chauhan & Associates
Named individuals
CA Anil Chauhan
FY audited
FY 2018-19 + 2019-20
Individual penalties
₹20 lakh on CA Chauhan
Debarment
Both CA and firm 10 years
Root cause (NFRA finding)
Non-cooperation — failed to submit audit documents to NFRA despite repeated reminders; non-compliance with accounting standards.
Standards cited
Order source →
SRS Real Infrastructure Ltd
2024-01-08
Auditor
M/s SVP & Associates
Named individuals
CA Pankaj Kumar (EP)
FY audited
FY 2017-18
Individual penalties
₹3 lakh
Debarment
3 years
Root cause (NFRA finding)
SFIO found falsified financials, round-tripping / layering, inflated purchases and sales; auditor failed to verify revenue, going concern, and perform sufficient audit work.
Standards cited
Order source →
CMI Ltd
2024
Auditor
M/s Krishna Neeraj & Associates
Named individuals
CA Krishna Kr Neeraj (EP)
FY audited
FY 2019-20 to FY 2021-22
Firm penalty
₹50 lakh
Individual penalties
₹10 lakh on Neeraj
Debarment
Neeraj 2 years
Root cause (NFRA finding)
Failed to assess going concern despite declining revenue / PAT / net worth; no physical inventory verification; documentation deficiencies.
Standards cited
Order source →
Brightcom Group Ltd
2024-04-26
Auditor
M/s PCN & Associates
Named individuals
CA Gopala Krishna Kandula (EP)
FY audited
FY 2019-20 to FY 2021-22
Firm penalty
₹50 lakh
Individual penalties
₹30 lakh on Kandula
Debarment
Firm 2 years · Kandula 10 years
Root cause (NFRA finding)
Non-cooperation — failed to submit documents; filed false affidavit; continued professional services while debarred.
Standards cited
Order source →
Vikas Proppant & Granite Ltd
2024-07-05
Auditor
M/s Yogesh Mahipal & Associates
Named individuals
CA Yogesh Mahipal
FY audited
FY 2018-19 + 2019-20
Individual penalties
₹2 lakh
Debarment
Both CA and firm 2 years
Root cause (NFRA finding)
Related-party transaction irregularities; non-provision of ECL; non-charging of depreciation.
Standards cited
Order source →
Vikas Proppant & Granite Ltd
2024-07-05
Auditor
M/s Singh Ajay & Co.
Named individuals
CA Priyank Mittal (EP)
FY audited
FY 2020-21
Firm penalty
₹3 lakh
Individual penalties
₹2 lakh on Mittal
Debarment
Mittal 2 years
Root cause (NFRA finding)
Failure to verify opening balances; non-reporting of ECL on receivables; insufficient audit work on related parties; no external confirmations.
Standards cited
Order source →
Ushdev International Ltd
2024-10-21
Auditor
CA Chirag Doshi (sole practitioner)
FY audited
FY 2017-18
Individual penalties
₹5 lakh
Root cause (NFRA finding)
Failures relating to fraud detection, due diligence and audit documentation.
Standards cited
Order source →

2023

5 orders
Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd (DHFL) — statutory
2023-04
Auditor
Chaturvedi & Shah LLP
Named individuals
CA Jignesh Mehta (EP), CA Amit Vinay Chaturvedi (EQCR)
FY audited
FY 2017-18
Individual penalties
₹5 lakh on Mehta · ₹5 lakh on Chaturvedi
Debarment
Mehta 10 years · Chaturvedi 5 years
Root cause (NFRA finding)
Failure to complete branch audits; failure to detect ~₹31,000 cr siphoning by promoters.
Standards cited
Order source →
DHFL branches (18 branch auditors collectively)
2023-09-29
Auditor
18 individual auditors / small firms incl. CA Akash Goel, CA Aabhas Tiwari, CA Kashinath Chaturvedi, CA D.N. Chaturvedi, CA Krishna Bihari Chaturvedi
FY audited
FY 2017-18
Individual penalties
~₹1 lakh each (₹18 lakh aggregate across 18 auditors)
Debarment
6 months to 1 year (14 of 18 debarred for 1 year)
Root cause (NFRA finding)
Accepted "Branch Statutory Auditor" appointments without valid AGM approval; inadequate documentation; no audit evidence in working-paper files.
Standards cited
Order source →
Mysore Amalgamated Coffee Estate Ltd (MACEL) / Giri Vidhyuth (India) Ltd (CDEL-related)
2023-05-30
Auditor
M/s Sundaresha & Associates
Named individuals
CA C. Ramesh, CA Chaitanya G. Deshpande
FY audited
FY 2019-20
Firm penalty
₹1 crore
Individual penalties
₹5 lakh on each of Ramesh and Deshpande
Debarment
Firm 2 years · Ramesh 5 years · Deshpande 5 years
Root cause (NFRA finding)
Failed to report ₹325 cr misstatement in cash flow; total misstatements ~₹1,776 cr at GVIL; failed to report shell-company fund diversion to MACEL.
Standards cited
Order source →
Tanglin Developments Ltd (CDEL subsidiary)
2023-08-18
Auditor
M/s Sundaresha & Associates
Named individuals
CA C. Ramesh
FY audited
FY 2019-20
Firm penalty
₹1 crore
Individual penalties
₹5 lakh on Ramesh
Debarment
Firm 4 years · Ramesh 5 years
Root cause (NFRA finding)
Material misstatements totalling ~₹1,471 cr; failed to detect MACEL fund diversion.
Standards cited
Order source →
MAN Industries (India) Ltd
2023-11-22
Auditor
CA Nilesh Chheda (sole practitioner)
FY audited
FY 2016-17
Individual penalties
₹5 lakh
Debarment
5 years
Root cause (NFRA finding)
Incorrectly issued "qualified" opinion on consolidated FS where non-consolidation of subsidiary was material and pervasive (i.e., should have been adverse).
Standards cited
Order source →

2022

1 order
Vikas WSP Ltd
2022-09-12
Auditor
M/s S. Prakash Aggarwal & Co. — CA Som Prakash Aggarwal
FY audited
FY 2019-20
Individual penalties
₹3 lakh
Debarment
3 years
Root cause (NFRA finding)
Non-recognition of interest on borrowings classified as NPAs — overstatement of profits.
Standards cited
Order source →

What NFRA cites most often

Across the verified orders above, ten failure themes recur. SAs called out at the <i>broad</i> level — specific paragraph numbers were not extractable from all secondary sources and have been omitted to avoid inaccuracy.

1
SA 240 — Fraud
~80% of major orders
Failure to identify and respond to risks of material misstatement due to fraud. Cited in Zee, Coffee Day, Reliance Capital, RHFL, RCFL, Religare Finvest, DHFL, Seya, MACEL orders.
2
SA 550 — Related Parties
Top 3 across major orders
Failure to question loans / advances disguised as RPTs; arm's-length pricing not tested. Coffee Day, Zee, RHFL, Reliance Capital, Brightcom.
3
SA 230 — Audit Documentation
Top 3
Missing or inadequate audit working-paper files. DHFL branch auditors, Seya, CMI, Brightcom.
4
SA 200 — Professional Skepticism
Recurring
Bias; failure to challenge management assertions. Zee, Reliance Capital, RHFL.
5
SA 315 — Risk Assessment
Recurring
Failure to identify risks of material misstatement at FS / assertion level. RHFL, RCFL.
6
SA 500 / 501 — Audit Evidence + Inventory
Recurring
Insufficient appropriate audit evidence; no physical inventory verification. CMI, SRS, Vikas Proppant.
7
SA 600 — Using Work of Other Auditors
Recurring
Over-reliance on subsidiary / branch auditors without sufficient review of their work. Coffee Day, DHFL, MAN Industries.
8
SA 570 — Going Concern
Recurring
Failure to assess going concern despite clear red flags. CMI, SRS.
9
Section 143(12) Companies Act 2013
Emerging
Delay or failure in reporting suspected fraud to MCA in Form ADT-4 within 60 days. Religare Finvest, Zee.
10
Non-cooperation with NFRA
Emerging
Failure to submit working-paper files; false affidavits. Brightcom, Seya.

Five practical takeaways for auditors

  1. Document the response to fraud risk indicators. SA 240 / SA 230 documentation gaps are the most-cited failure. Even if no fraud is identified, the working paper must show what red flags you considered and how you responded.
  2. Test related-party transactions independently. Do not accept management assertions on arm’s-length pricing or ordinary-course-of-business carve-outs. SA 550 procedures must include corroborative evidence.
  3. Maintain contemporaneous working papers under SA 230. NFRA reviews the file the auditor produces — gaps cannot be filled retrospectively. Brightcom, Seya and DHFL branch auditor orders all cite documentation deficiencies.
  4. React to predecessor-auditor red flags. Multiple orders (Reliance Capital, RHFL, RCFL) cite ignoring a resigning auditor’s reported fraud. SA 510 communications with predecessor are not optional formalities.
  5. Report suspected fraud under Section 143(12) within timelines. ADT-4 within 60 days where fraud is ≥ ₹1 cr. Religare Finvest and Zee orders cite delay alone as a failure — even where the underlying audit work was substantially complete.

Frequently asked questions

What is NFRA and what does it do?+
The National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) is the Government of India authority constituted under Section 132 of the Companies Act 2013. NFRA recommends accounting and auditing standards, monitors and enforces compliance, and oversees the quality of service of professions associated with statutory audit. It has both inspection (Audit Quality Inspection Programme) and disciplinary (under Section 132(4)) jurisdiction over auditors of certain Public Interest Entities (PIEs).
Which audits fall under NFRA jurisdiction?+
Under NFRA Rules 2018 Rule 3: (a) all listed companies; (b) unlisted public companies with paid-up share capital ≥ ₹500 crore OR turnover ≥ ₹1,000 crore OR loans / debentures / deposits outstanding ≥ ₹500 crore as on 31 March of preceding FY; (c) insurance / banking / electricity-generating companies of specified size; (d) any body corporate or person referred to NFRA by the Central Government in public interest.
How does NFRA action differ from ICAI disciplinary action?+
ICAI Disciplinary Committee can hold professional misconduct proceedings against members under the CA Act 1949 — removal of name from Register, fine, reprimand. NFRA has parallel jurisdiction over audits of NFRA-covered entities, with stronger remedies including monetary penalties up to 10 times the fees received and debarment for up to 10 years from being appointed as an auditor or internal auditor.
What is the largest NFRA penalty so far?+
On 19 August 2024, NFRA imposed ₹10 crore on M/s BSR & Associates LLP (KPMG-affiliated) in the Coffee Day Enterprises matter — the largest firm-level penalty NFRA has issued. The same order debarred the engagement partner for 10 years and the EQCR partner for 5 years.
What are the most common audit failures NFRA cites?+
Across the verified orders, the top recurring failure themes are: SA 240 (fraud — failure to investigate or respond to fraud risk indicators); SA 550 (related parties — loans / advances disguised as RPTs not tested); SA 230 (documentation — missing or inadequate working papers); SA 200 (professional skepticism — failure to challenge management assertions); and Section 143(12) (delayed or missing ADT-4 fraud reporting).
Has NFRA action slowed in 2025?+
Yes. In February 2025 the Delhi High Court ruled against NFRA on procedural grounds — specifically the separation of functions between investigation and disciplinary outcomes (Engagement Quality Control Review jurisdiction). In March 2025 the Supreme Court partly restored NFRA's authority but stayed final orders pending the larger review. As a result, only one disciplinary order has been issued in 2025 (Religare Finvest — January 2025).
Does NFRA inspect all PIE audits?+
No. NFRA's Audit Quality Inspection Programme launched in December 2022 and has concentrated on the Big 6 / network firms (Deloitte HSL, BSR & Co LLP / KPMG affiliate, SRBC & Co LLP / EY affiliate, Walker Chandiok / Grant Thornton, Price Waterhouse / PwC, S.R. Batliboi). The 2024 cycle covered 10 firms and 42 audit engagements with five inspection teams. From September 2025 NFRA expanded outreach to small / mid-tier firms via city-based programmes (Hyderabad, Indore) and the Audit Firms Survey 2025.
What can an auditor learn from NFRA orders?+
Five practical takeaways: (1) document the audit response to fraud risk indicators — SA 240 documentation gaps are the #1 finding; (2) test related-party transactions independently — do not accept management assertions on arm's-length pricing; (3) maintain audit working papers contemporaneously per SA 230 — NFRA reviews the file the auditor produces; (4) react to predecessor-auditor red flags — multiple orders cite ignoring a resigning auditor's reported fraud; (5) report suspected fraud under Section 143(12) within timelines — delay alone has triggered penalties.
Authoritative sources
NFRA — official orders, inspection reports and annual reports. For each order in this tracker, the source URL links to the NFRA PDF where directly findable, otherwise to a contemporaneous news report summarising the order. For paragraph-level SA citations refer the individual order PDF.
Disclaimer — This page summarises public NFRA orders for educational reference. Specific findings and rulings are NFRA’s; CORAA neither endorses nor disputes them. Always refer the underlying order for full text. Last reviewed: 28 May 2026.

Anchor your own audit in the same Standards.

SA 240 fraud testing, SA 550 RPT review, SA 230 documentation and SA 570 going concern — every standard NFRA cites is operationalised on CORAA.

All SA pagesSA 240 JE Risk ScorerSA 570 Going Concern Scorer