| Benchmark | Base value | Range % | Mat. low | Mat. high |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹125 Cr | 0.5% – 1.0% | ₹63 L | ₹1.3 Cr |
| Total Assets | ₹250 Cr | 0.5% – 1.0% | ₹1.3 Cr | ₹2.5 Cr |
| Profit Before Tax Recommended | ₹139 Cr | 5.0% – 10.0% | ₹6.9 Cr | ₹13.9 Cr |
| Total Expenses | ₹95.0 Cr | 0.5% – 1.0% | ₹48 L | ₹95 L |
Materiality, under SA 320 (Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit), is the threshold above which misstatements — individually or in aggregate — could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements. There is no single formula prescribed; the auditor exercises professional judgement to choose a benchmark and apply a percentage.
In practice, three numbers are documented: (1) overall materiality for the financial statements as a whole; (2) performance materiality — typically 50%–75% of overall — used during fieldwork to address the risk that the aggregate of immaterial misstatements exceeds overall materiality; and (3) the trivial threshold below which misstatements need not be accumulated (usually 3%–5% of overall).
Common benchmarks are 5%–10% of profit before tax (profitable companies), 0.5%–1% of revenue (loss-making or volatile profit), 0.5%–1% of total assets (asset-heavy entities like NBFCs), and 0.5%–2% of total expenses (nonprofits and government).
You are auditing an unlisted private company with stable profits. The trial balance shows the following key figures.