CORAA
CORAA University / Free fieldwork tool

Internal audit fieldwork testing tracker

Track RCM tests, samples, evidence status, exceptions, reviewer progress and report readiness across P2P, O2C, R2R, H2R, inventory, treasury, compliance and ITGC.

Fieldwork profile
Tests
9
Workflow
54%
Evidence
51%
In testing
6
Reviewed
0
Exceptions
3
Blocked
4
Testing tracker
CycleRefWPObjectiveProcedurePopulationSampleSample refEvidence refOwnerEvidenceStatusResultRatingExceptionPrepared byPrepared onReviewerReviewed onReview noteDue
P2P
65%

2 tests; 1 exceptions; 1 evidence blockers.

O2C
15%

1 tests; 0 exceptions; 1 evidence blockers.

R2R
45%

1 tests; 0 exceptions; 0 evidence blockers.

H2R
40%

1 tests; 0 exceptions; 1 evidence blockers.

Inventory
65%

1 tests; 1 exceptions; 0 evidence blockers.

Treasury
15%

1 tests; 0 exceptions; 1 evidence blockers.

Tax/Compliance
80%

1 tests; 0 exceptions; 0 evidence blockers.

ITGC
65%

1 tests; 1 exceptions; 0 evidence blockers.

Where it fits

From testing to review-ready testing

The fieldwork tracker sits between the RCM/sampling plan and the observation report. It keeps test status, evidence blockers, exceptions and reviewer readiness visible before management discussion.

Need the surrounding workpapers? Use the RCM builder, sampling plan generator, observation report generator and dashboard pack.

How an internal audit fieldwork tracker works

Internal audit fieldwork fails quietly when evidence requests, RCM test steps, sample status and exception drafting live in separate files. A tracker gives the audit manager one view of which controls are still waiting for evidence, which tests are in progress, which exceptions need management discussion and which rows are ready for review.

This tracker is structured around the RCM: cycle, test reference, control objective, procedure, population, sample size, evidence owner, evidence status, test result, rating and reviewer. It does not replace the evidence file; it makes the fieldwork file navigable.

The export is designed for weekly fieldwork calls. The Excel version gives a detailed tracker, cycle summary, exception handoff and review meeting pack. The PDF gives a concise status summary that can be attached to fieldwork updates.

Worked example - P2P fieldwork review before draft report

A P2P review has vendor master, invoice matching and payment release tests. Vendor master testing passed, but invoice matching has missing tolerance approval evidence and some PBC items are still partial.

Inputs
Evidence statusPartial for invoice testing
ResultException
RatingMedium until management discussion
Output
Cycle summaryP2P has blockers and one exception
Next stepEscalate evidence, complete exception summary, move to observation report after reviewer approval
The tracker separates fieldwork status from final reporting. An exception can be visible in fieldwork before it is mature enough for the report pack.

Common mistakes

Using the tracker as evidence
The tracker is an index and status view. Evidence still needs to be retained with source reports, screenshots, approvals, sample selections and reviewer notes.
Calling an item cleared before reviewer approval
A test may be completed by the preparer but still need review. Keep “Ready for review” and “Reviewed” separate.
Letting exceptions skip rating rationale
Exceptions should move into the report only after condition, criteria, cause, effect, recommendation, rating and management response are supportable.
Ignoring blocked evidence requests
Partial or pending evidence should be escalated early. Otherwise fieldwork completion looks high while key tests remain unsupported.

Frequently asked questions

What is an internal audit fieldwork testing tracker?+
It is a control-test status file that tracks RCM tests, sample size, evidence owner, evidence status, testing status, result, exception summary, rating, reviewer and due date.
Is this the same as an RCM?+
No. The RCM defines risks, controls and test procedures. The fieldwork tracker manages execution of those tests during fieldwork and shows what is blocked, cleared, reviewed or ready for reporting.
Should exceptions be reported directly from this tracker?+
No. The tracker identifies report candidates. Final observations should be drafted with evidence, criteria, cause, effect, recommendation, rating rationale, management response and reviewer approval.
Can this be used for P2P, O2C, R2R and ITGC audits?+
Yes. The default rows cover common cycles, and rows can be edited for any internal audit assignment or industry programme.

Authoritative sources

ICAI
ICAI IASB - Standards on Internal AuditICAI publishes Standards on Internal Audit covering assignment planning, evidence, documentation, reporting and follow-up.
MCA
Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 - Rule 13Rule 13(2) frames scope, functioning, periodicity and methodology through Audit Committee or Board consultation.
Always confirm against the latest version of the source. Regulations evolve and amendments are common.
Related calculators
Internal audit RCM builderInternal audit sampling plan generatorObservation report generatorDashboard pack generatorCycle-wise internal audit programmes
Share this tool
Last reviewed: 2026-08-30 · For informational purposes only — not professional advice.