CORAA
Resources · Internal Audit India

Internal audit, one workflow.

A practical internal audit workflow for CA firms and audit teams: plan the year, scope the engagement, request evidence, test controls, rate issues, report to the committee and track closure. Start with the stage you are in and keep the next handoff visible.

Start with annual planSee the product workflow
6
connected stages
10+
interactive workpapers
1
reviewable trail
Plan → evidence → conclusion

Every stage leaves the next stage ready the handoff

01Plan the year

Turn risk into a workable plan

Rank the audit universe, map cycles to quarters, estimate hours and identify areas suitable for continuous monitoring.

Annual plan generatorRisk scorer
02Scope the work

Agree the engagement before fieldwork

Set the reporting line, cycles, cadence, exclusions, deliverables, stakeholder RACI and the first evidence requests.

SOW generatorKickoff pack
03Request evidence

Start with reliable source data

Ask for reports with owners, purpose, period, filters, due dates, control totals and status—not a folder of unexplained spreadsheets.

Data request listSource-data readiness
Use it as a firm operating rhythm

A repeatable file is easier to review for every client

For each engagement, keep the same core sequence: approve scope, issue the PBC list, validate source data, map risks and controls, test, rate observations, obtain responses, retest and report. The structure stays consistent while the cycle, ERP, risk appetite and evidence requirements change.

Browse all internal-audit resourcesCheck source-data readiness
Questions
What is an internal audit command centre?

It is a practical starting point that connects annual planning, scope, evidence intake, control testing, issue reporting and follow-up into one repeatable workflow.

Can a CA firm use this for multiple clients?

Yes. Use the public tools as engagement starters, then tailor the scope, evidence fields, RCM, sample basis, reporting line and reviewer requirements for each client.

Does this replace professional judgement?

No. These are planning and workpaper aids. Final scope, testing, conclusions, ratings and reporting require the responsible internal-audit team and applicable governance approvals.