CORAA

Section 264 Revision Application Format 2026 (Word) — Revision Petition to the Pr.CIT / CIT

Application to the Principal Commissioner / Commissioner for revision of an order in the assessee's favour under section 264 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 — statement of facts, maintainability paragraphs, grounds, prayer and verification.

Free · CORAA original — SA-aligned
Updated 1 Oct 2026
Type
Application — revision in favour of the assessee
Section & authority
S. 264, Income-tax Act 1961 — jurisdictional Pr.CIT / CIT (orders up to AY 2026-27)
Time limit
1 year from communication of the order or knowledge of it, whichever is earlier
Filed via
Written application to the Pr.CIT / CIT with challan for the ₹500 fee
Share this template
Engagement details
The client and period this document is for.
Addressed to
Recipient of the letter — usually the company's board.
What’s inside

An excerpt from the template.

APPLICATION FOR REVISION UNDER SECTION 264 OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961

The applicant respectfully submits as under:

A. Statement of facts

1. The applicant is ____________ [state constitution and nature of business / source of income in one or two sentences].

↑ Excerpt only — the full template is what you download as Word
About this template

What you’re downloading, and when to use it.

This template follows the format published by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) in the AASB Audit Working Paper Templates (June 2023), the authoritative reference for Indian statutory-audit documentation. Fill in your firm’s letterhead and the engagement details on the form above, click Download Word file, and you’ll get a fully formatted .docx ready to use.

Everything is generated in your browser and on a stateless API endpoint — no account, nothing stored on our servers. We’ll ask for a work email once before your first download so we can send you the file and the occasional relevant update; after that, downloads on this device are instant. Edit freely in Word, Google Docs or Pages before sending to your client.

Common questions

FAQs.

What is the time limit and fee for a revision application under section 264?
One year from the date on which the order was communicated to the assessee, or the date on which the assessee otherwise came to know of it, whichever is earlier. The Commissioner can admit a later application if satisfied that the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause from applying in time, so a delayed application should carry a condonation paragraph with the reasons and evidence. The application carries a fee of ₹500, paid by challan and enclosed with it.
Can I file both an appeal and a revision application against the same order?
No. Under section 264(4) the Commissioner cannot revise an order while an appeal against it lies and the time for filing it has not expired, unless the assessee waives the right of appeal; nor where the order is pending in appeal or has been made the subject of an appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) or the Tribunal. The choice has to be made within the appeal period, and the application should state that no appeal has been filed and that the right is waived or has lapsed.
What kind of orders can be revised under section 264?
Any order passed by an authority subordinate to the Commissioner, other than an order to which section 263 applies. Courts have read the power widely — it has been applied to intimations under section 143(1) and to mistakes made by the assessee in the return, such as income offered twice or a deduction missed, where the return and rectification routes are closed. It is a discretionary remedy, so clear facts and complete documents matter.
Can the Commissioner make things worse for me in a 264 revision?
No. Section 264 allows the Commissioner to pass such order as he thinks fit, "not being an order prejudicial to the assessee". An order declining to interfere is not treated as prejudicial. The risk in a revision application is rejection, not enhancement.
How long does the Commissioner have to decide, and what if the application is rejected?
The order has to be passed within one year from the end of the financial year in which the application is made. An order under section 264 is not appealable to the Tribunal; if the rejection is arbitrary or ignores the material on record, the remedy is a writ petition before the High Court.
Does section 264 still apply in 2026 after the Income-tax Act, 2025?
Yes, for orders relating to AY 2026-27 and earlier years, which continue to be revised under section 264 of the 1961 Act. For tax year 2026-27 onwards, section 378 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 provides for revision of other orders on the same lines, including the one-year period for the Commissioner's decision.
Related templates

You might also need.

Section 154 Rectification Application Format — Mistake Apparent from Record
Free section 154 rectification application format — mistake apparent from record letter with TDS mismatch and
Form 35 Grounds of Appeal Format — Statement of Facts for CIT(A) Appeal
Free Form 35 grounds of appeal format — statement of facts, numbered grounds, prayer and verification for CIT(
Section 119(2)(b) Condonation of Delay Application Format — Refund & Loss Claims
Free section 119(2)(b) condonation of delay application format — genuine hardship grounds for belated refund a
Response to 143(1) Intimation — Reply Format with Reconciliation Table
Free reply format for 143(1) intimation adjustments — clause-wise reconciliation of returned vs processed inco