CORAA
CORAA University · Free tool · 2026

Loan to a director in 2026 allowed or not?

A company wants to lend to a director, a relative, or a company the director is connected with — or to guarantee their bank loan. Pick who is on the other side and get the answer: barred outright, allowed with a special resolution, or exempt — with the private-company exemption tested on your own numbers, and the penalty if it goes ahead anyway. The rules are those in force for FY 2025-26 and FY 2026-27.

The company and the transaction
Company giving the loan, guarantee or security
What is being given
Who receives the loan — or whose loan is being guaranteed or secured
Amount (₹ lakh)
For the working only — Section 185 has no monetary threshold. One rupee to a director is as barred as one crore.
Private company exemption — all conditions must hold
Has any other body corporate invested money in the company’s share capital?
A company, LLP or foreign body corporate as shareholder takes the exemption away
Paid-up share capital (₹ lakh)
Borrowings from banks, financial institutions and bodies corporate (₹ lakh)
Must be less than ₹200 lakh — the lower of twice paid-up capital and ₹50 crore. Loans from directors and other individuals are not counted.
Is there a default in repayment of those borrowings subsisting today?
Tested at the time of making the loan or giving the guarantee or security
Has the company defaulted in filing its financial statements or annual return?
AOC-4 under Section 137 or MGT-7 / MGT-7A under Section 92 — condition added on 13 June 2017
Exemptions and conditions inside the section
Does the company lend in the ordinary course of its business, charging at least the G-Sec yield on this loan?
Section 185(3)(b) — the yield of the 1, 3, 5 or 10-year Government security closest to the loan’s tenor
Is the director a managing director or whole-time director?
Section 185(3)(a) is confined to them
Why this matters in audit

A Section 185 breach usually shows up in the ledger, not the minutes

Director loans rarely appear under that name. They sit as advances, current-account debits and unpaid recoverables — a loan represented by a book debt is inside Section 185. CORAA reads party ledgers against the director and related-party list so the CARO clause 3(iv) answer rests on the books.

Cleared Section 185? The same loan still has to pass the ceiling and interest-rate tests — run the Section 186 loan cap calculator — and a contract with the same party may need approval under the Section 188 related-party thresholds.

Can a company give a loan to a director in 2026? How Section 185 decides

Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013 was rewritten by the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 and has applied in its present form since 7 May 2018. It sorts every loan, guarantee or security into three boxes. Sub-section (1) is an outright bar: no company may, directly or indirectly, advance any loan — including a loan represented by a book debt — to, or give any guarantee or provide any security in connection with a loan taken by, a director of the company or of its holding company, a partner or relative of such a director, or a firm in which such a director or relative is a partner. No approval, by the Board or the shareholders, can authorise it.

Sub-section (2) is a conditional permission. A company may lend to, or guarantee or secure a loan taken by, "any person in whom any of the director of the company is interested" — which the Explanation defines as a private company of which the director is a director or member, a body corporate in which the director (alone or with other directors) controls 25% or more of the voting power at a general meeting, and a body corporate whose Board, managing director or manager is accustomed to act on the directions of the lending company’s Board or directors. Two conditions apply: a special resolution passed in general meeting, with an explanatory statement disclosing the full particulars and the purpose; and use of the loan by the borrowing company for its principal business activities.

Sub-section (3) takes four cases out of both rules: a loan to a managing or whole-time director as part of conditions of service extended to all employees, or under a scheme approved by special resolution; a company that lends or gives guarantees in the ordinary course of business, charging not less than the yield of the Government security closest to the loan’s tenor; a holding company’s loan, guarantee or security to or for its wholly owned subsidiary; and a holding company’s guarantee or security for a bank or financial-institution loan to any subsidiary — the last two only where the subsidiary uses the money for its principal business activities. Separately, MCA notification G.S.R. 464(E) of 5 June 2015 switches Section 185 off altogether for a private company in which no body corporate has invested, whose borrowings from banks, financial institutions and bodies corporate are less than twice its paid-up capital or ₹50 crore, whichever is lower, and which has no subsisting repayment default — provided, since 13 June 2017, it is not in default in filing its financial statements or annual return.

Worked example — a private company lending ₹25 lakh to its director in FY 2026-27

A private limited company with paid-up share capital of ₹1 crore wants to lend ₹25 lakh to one of its two directors. All shares are held by the two directors personally. The company has a bank term loan and cash-credit limit outstanding of ₹2.2 crore, serviced regularly, and its AOC-4 and MGT-7A are filed up to date.

Inputs
LenderPrivate company
RecipientA director — within Section 185(1)(a)
Body corporate as shareholderNone ✓
Paid-up share capital₹100 lakh
Borrowings from banks / FIs / bodies corporate₹220 lakh
Repayment default / filing defaultNone ✓
Output
Borrowing capLower of 2 × ₹100 lakh and ₹50 crore = ₹200 lakh
Borrowings below the cap?No — ₹220 lakh is not less than ₹200 lakh ✗
Private company exemptionNot available
VerdictProhibited under Section 185(1)
ExposureCompany ₹5–25 lakh fine; officer and director up to 6 months or ₹5–25 lakh
Two of the three exemption conditions are met, but the borrowing condition fails by ₹20 lakh, and the conditions are cumulative. Because the recipient is a director, the case falls under sub-section (1), where no special resolution can help. Had bank borrowings been ₹1.9 crore on the date of the loan, Section 185 would not have applied at all — which is why the test should be minuted on the date of the transaction.

Common mistakes

Assuming every private company is exempt
The exemption is conditional and cumulative. One corporate shareholder — a holding company, an investor LLP, a foreign parent — removes it entirely. So does a bank borrowing that reaches twice the paid-up capital, which is common in a thinly capitalised company with a working-capital limit.
Passing a special resolution for a loan to a director
The special-resolution route exists only in sub-section (2), for entities in which a director is interested. A loan to the director personally, to a relative, or to a firm in which either is a partner falls under sub-section (1), which has no approval route. The resolution is void for the purpose and the contravention stands.
Missing loans that are not called loans
The section covers "any loan, including any loan represented by a book debt". A director’s current account that runs into debit, personal expenses paid by the company and parked as recoverable, or an advance left outstanding without a business purpose can each be a loan in substance.
Testing only the lender’s own directors
Sub-section (1)(a) reaches a director of the company "or of a company which is its holding company". A subsidiary lending to a director of its parent is caught even if that person holds no office in the subsidiary.
Forgetting guarantees and security
A company that mortgages its property or gives a corporate guarantee for a director’s personal bank loan has not advanced a rupee, yet it is within the section in exactly the same way as a loan.
Ignoring the end-use condition
Sub-section (2)(b) and the proviso to sub-section (3) both require the money to be used for the borrower’s principal business activities. Sub-section (4) penalises a loan "utilised in contravention" of the section, so a properly approved loan that is diverted is still a breach.
Stopping at Section 185
A transaction that clears Section 185 — through the exemption or a special resolution — still has to satisfy Section 186: the unanimous Board resolution, the ceiling and the minimum interest rate under Section 186(7). The two sections are tested separately and the auditor reports on both under CARO 2020 clause 3(iv).

Frequently asked questions

Can a private limited company give a loan to its director in 2026?+
Only if Section 185 does not apply to it — and the position is the same for FY 2025-26 and FY 2026-27. Under MCA notification G.S.R. 464(E) dated 5 June 2015, the section does not apply to a private company in whose share capital no other body corporate has invested, whose borrowings from banks, financial institutions or bodies corporate are less than twice its paid-up share capital or ₹50 crore, whichever is lower, and which has no default in repayment of those borrowings subsisting at the time of the loan. Since 13 June 2017 the company must also not be in default in filing its financial statements or annual return. If any condition fails, a loan to a director is prohibited under Section 185(1).
Can a company give a loan to a director with shareholder approval?+
Not to the director personally. Section 185(1) is an absolute prohibition for directors, their relatives and partners, and firms in which they are partners — a special resolution does not cure it. The exception is a managing or whole-time director, who may be given a loan as part of conditions of service extended to all employees or under a scheme approved by the members by special resolution.
Can a company lend to another company in which its director is a director?+
Yes, subject to Section 185(2). A private company of which the lender’s director is a director or member is a "person in whom the director is interested". The loan is permitted if a special resolution is passed in general meeting, with an explanatory statement disclosing the full particulars and purpose, and the borrowing company uses the loan for its principal business activities.
Is a loan from a holding company to its subsidiary covered by Section 185?+
A loan to a wholly owned subsidiary, or a guarantee or security for any loan to it, is exempt under Section 185(3)(c). For a subsidiary that is not wholly owned, only a guarantee or security for a loan made to it by a bank or financial institution is exempt, under Section 185(3)(d). Both exemptions require the subsidiary to use the loan for its principal business activities. A direct loan to a subsidiary that is not wholly owned has to go through the special-resolution route in Section 185(2) where the subsidiary is an entity in which a director is interested.
What is the penalty for giving a loan to a director in violation of Section 185 in 2026?+
A fine of ₹5 lakh to ₹25 lakh on the company, and imprisonment up to six months or a fine of ₹5 lakh to ₹25 lakh on the officers and on the recipient. Under Section 185(4), the company is punishable with a fine of not less than ₹5 lakh, which may extend to ₹25 lakh. Every officer in default is punishable with imprisonment up to six months or with a fine of ₹5 lakh to ₹25 lakh. The director or other person who received the loan, or whose loan was guaranteed or secured, is punishable with imprisonment up to six months or a fine of ₹5 lakh to ₹25 lakh, or both.
Who is a relative of a director for Section 185?+
Section 2(77) read with Rule 4 of the Companies (Specification of Definitions Details) Rules, 2014: members of the same Hindu Undivided Family, husband and wife, father and mother (including step-parents), son and daughter (including step-son), son’s wife, daughter’s husband, and brother and sister (including step-siblings).
Does Section 185 apply to a loan taken by the company from a director?+
No. Section 185 restricts loans given by the company. Money received by a company from its director is tested under the deposit rules — it is excluded from "deposit" where the director gives a written declaration that the money is not out of borrowed funds.
Is there a minimum amount below which Section 185 does not apply?+
No. The section has no monetary threshold. Any loan, guarantee or security to a person covered by sub-section (1) is prohibited regardless of size.
Does the auditor report on Section 185?+
Yes. Clause 3(iv) of CARO 2020 requires the auditor to state whether the provisions of Sections 185 and 186 have been complied with in respect of loans, investments, guarantees and security, and if not, to give the details.

Authoritative sources

MCA
Companies Act, 2013 — Section 185 — Substituted by the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 with effect from 7 May 2018. Sub-section (1) is the absolute bar, sub-section (2) the special-resolution route for entities in which a director is interested, sub-section (3) the exemptions, sub-section (4) the penalty.
MCA
MCA Notification G.S.R. 464(E), 5 June 2015 — exemptions to private companies — Section 185 does not apply to a private company with no body-corporate shareholder, borrowings from banks, financial institutions and bodies corporate below the lower of twice paid-up capital and ₹50 crore, and no subsisting repayment default. Amended on 13 June 2017 to require that the company is not in default in filing financial statements or the annual return.
MCA
MCA Notifications G.S.R. 463(E) and G.S.R. 465(E), 5 June 2015 — Government companies are outside Section 185 with prior approval of the administrative Ministry or State Government; Nidhis are outside it for loans to a director or relative as a member, disclosed by a note in the accounts.
MCA
Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2020 — clause 3(iv) — Requires the auditor to report whether Sections 185 and 186 have been complied with in respect of loans, investments, guarantees and security.
Always confirm against the latest version of the source. Regulations evolve and amendments are common.
Related calculators
Section 186 loan cap calculator →Section 188 RPT threshold calculator →Deposit or not checker →Section 197 remuneration calculator →CARO 2020 applicability checker →
Share this tool
Last reviewed: 2026-10-01 · For informational purposes only — not professional advice.