CORAA
AI Modules/Working Papers/Schedule III Disclosure Review
Schedule III · Disclosure Review· पत्र

Schedule III Disclosure Review

A groups, hero, and blockers view that walks every Schedule III disclosure requirement and surfaces which ones are missing, before the filing deadline, not during final review.

CORAA Notes to Accounts detail with Schedule III cross-references

A missing Schedule III note is usually found during final review, days before filing, when there is little time left to fix it. CORAA's Disclosure Review walks every Schedule III disclosure requirement against the engagement's own data and presents it as a groups, hero, and blockers view, the disclosure groups the requirement falls under, the headline status for the statement as a whole, and the specific blockers still outstanding, so a missing disclosure surfaces the moment the data behind it exists, not the week the filing is due.

  • Walks every Schedule III disclosure requirement against the engagement's own data
  • Groups, hero, and blockers view, not a flat checklist
  • Missing disclosures surface as soon as the underlying data exists, not at final review
  • Named blockers for each missing disclosure, not a generic incomplete status
  • Cited to Schedule III, Companies Act 2013
Two paths, one ledger

The old way, and ours.

Two paths to the same audit conclusion. One leaves traces; the other doesn't.

Traditional

The old way

  • -Disclosure checklist reviewed manually against last year's filed statements
  • -A missing note discovered during final review, days before the filing deadline
  • -No single view of which disclosure requirements are covered and which are still open
  • -Requirements re-checked from memory rather than walked systematically
A disclosure checklist run once at final review finds gaps at the worst possible time to fix them.
CORAA

On the Ledger

  • Every Schedule III disclosure requirement is walked against the engagement's data automatically
  • Missing disclosures surface as soon as the gap exists, not at the final-review deadline
  • Blockers view names exactly which requirement is unmet
  • Groups and hero status give a single view of overall disclosure completeness
The gap is found the week the data first goes missing, not the week the filing is due.
How it works

Three steps. Every trace logged.

Step 01

Every requirement walked against the engagement's data

CORAA holds the full set of Schedule III disclosure requirements and checks each one against what the engagement's working papers and Sch III report actually contain, rather than relying on a reviewer's memory of what was covered last year.

Step 02

Groups, hero, and blockers view

Requirements are organised by disclosure group, a hero status gives the headline picture for the statement as a whole, and a blockers list names each requirement that is not yet met, so the reviewer sees both the overview and the specifics in one place.

Step 03

Surfaced before the filing deadline

Because the review runs continuously against the current state of the engagement, a disclosure gap is visible as soon as it exists, well before the final-review week when there is little time left to close it.

Inside the module

What you actually get.

Full Schedule III requirement walk

Every disclosure requirement under Schedule III is checked against the engagement's own data, not a static checklist carried forward from last year.

  • Covers Division I and Division II requirements as applicable
  • Checked against the engagement's own Sch III report and working papers
  • Recomputes as the engagement's data changes

Groups and hero status

Disclosure requirements are organised by group, with a hero status giving the headline picture of overall disclosure completeness.

  • Grouped by the Schedule III disclosure category
  • One hero status for the statement as a whole
  • Drill from the hero status into any group

Named blockers

Every missing disclosure is listed as a specific, named blocker rather than a generic incomplete flag.

  • Each blocker names the exact requirement unmet
  • Links back to where the supporting data should come from
  • Clears automatically once the requirement is satisfied

Surfaced ahead of the filing deadline

Because the review runs continuously, gaps are visible well before the final-review week rather than being discovered against a filing deadline.

  • Continuous check, not a once-at-final-review pass
  • Time to close a gap instead of scrambling before filing
  • Reduces the chance of a missing note surfacing after signing
Frequently asked

Answers, up front.

No. CORAA surfaces the requirement and whatever data exists against it. Where a requirement is not applicable to the entity, that remains the auditor's determination, recorded against the requirement rather than silently cleared.
The requirement is listed as a named blocker rather than marked complete or silently skipped, so the auditor knows exactly which disclosure still needs supporting data.
As soon as the review runs against the engagement's current data, well before the final-review week. It does not wait for a scheduled checklist pass close to the filing deadline.
See it on a real ledger

Run schedule iii disclosure review on one of your engagements.

Bring a Trial Balance and a General Ledger. We'll walk through working papers end-to-end on your data, not a sandbox.

Start the free trial →
Schedule III Disclosure Review | Groups, Hero, Blockers | CORAA