CORAA
University · Reporting

Audit Finding Builder.

Write each finding in five parts: condition, criteria, cause, consequence and corrective action. Rate it on a likelihood and impact matrix whose bands you set, then copy the text or export it.

The finding

The grey examples show the style only. Write the facts of your own engagement and keep the evidence reference in the working paper.

Rating and output
Score9
RatingMedium
Parts still blankCondition, Criteria, Cause, Consequence, Corrective action
Finding: Payments released before goods receipt Rating: Medium (likelihood 3 x impact 3 = 9) Condition: [to be completed] Criteria: [to be completed] Cause: [to be completed] Consequence: [to be completed] Corrective action: [to be completed]

The matrix bands are your own. Use the thresholds in the engagement methodology or the client's risk policy and keep them the same across findings in a report.

A finding a reader can act on.

A good finding answers five questions. What did you see, what should have been there, why is it different, why does it matter, and what should change. Leaving out the cause leads to fixes that treat symptoms. Leaving out the consequence leaves management unsure how urgent the finding is. Rating each finding on the same matrix lets the report put the serious ones first.

Observation report generatorIssue rating matrix generator

How the rating works

You score likelihood and impact from 1 to 5. The tool multiplies them to give a score from 1 to 25.

You set the scores at which the rating becomes Medium, High and Critical. Below the Medium score the rating is Low. The tool then assembles the five parts and the rating into one block of text you can copy into a report.

It also tells you which of the five parts are still blank.

Worked example — payment before receipt

Likelihood 4, impact 4, with Medium from 5, High from 10 and Critical from 16.

Inputs
Likelihood4
Impact4
Bands5 / 10 / 16
Output
Score16
RatingCritical
Moving either score down by one gives 12 and a High rating.

Common mistakes

Condition and cause mixed together
State what was found first, then separately why it happened.
Recommendations that restate the criteria
"Follow the policy" is not an action. Say what control or step would prevent a repeat.
Changing the bands between findings
Keep the same rating bands across a report so ratings can be compared.

Frequently asked questions

Why "5 Cs"?+
Condition, criteria, cause, consequence and corrective action. Some teams call the last one conclusion or recommendation.
Are the default bands a standard?+
No. Use the bands in your methodology or the client's policy.
Is my text uploaded?+
No. Nothing leaves your browser.

Authoritative sources

ICAI — Standards on Internal Audit (reporting) — Internal audit reporting. Check the current text.
Always confirm against the latest version of the source. Regulations evolve and amendments are common.
Related calculators
Observation report generator →Issue rating matrix generator →Control deficiency aggregation worksheet →
Share this tool
Last reviewed: 2026-10-17 · For informational purposes only — not professional advice.