CORAA
University · Practice management

Client Acceptance Risk Score Calculator.

List the risk factors your firm looks at before taking on a client, give each a weight for how much it matters and a score for how bad it looks for this client. The tool gives a weighted score as a percentage of the worst case, places it in your own bands, and lists the factors that need escalation on their own.

Factors

A higher score means higher risk. The sample factors and weights are placeholders. Use the factors in your firm quality management policy.

This is a structured way to record your judgement, not a decision. Acceptance and continuance must follow your firm policies, the Code of Ethics and the current standards on quality management.

Result
Weighted score (% of worst case)46.7
BandMedium
Factors for single-factor escalation2

Score is in your medium band. Document how each high-scoring factor will be handled and who approved acceptance.

FactorWeightScoreWeightedEscalate
Integrity and reputation of owners5.02.010.0
Complexity of the business3.04.012.0Yes
Prior auditor change or dispute4.01.04.0
Reliance on a few key customers2.03.06.0
Quality of accounting records4.04.016.0Yes
Pressure on the proposed fee3.03.09.0
Independence or conflict concerns5.01.05.0
Firm competence in the sector4.02.08.0

Acceptance is a judgement. A score makes it consistent.

Two partners can look at the same prospect and reach different views, mostly because they weigh the factors differently. Writing the factors down with weights, and agreeing the bands in advance, gives the firm a consistent way to compare prospects and a record of why a risky client was accepted or turned away.

SQM 1 gap assessmentAudit risk scorer

How the score is worked out

Each factor has a weight and a score from zero to your highest score. The weighted value is weight times score.

The total is divided by the worst case, which is the total weight times the highest score, and shown as a percentage. You choose where the medium and high bands start.

Any single factor scored at or above your escalation level is listed on its own, so one serious concern is not averaged away.

Worked example — two factors

Highest score is 5. Integrity has weight 5 and score 2. Complexity has weight 3 and score 4.

Inputs
IntegrityWeight 5, score 2
ComplexityWeight 3, score 4
Output
Weighted total22
Worst case40
Score55%
With a medium band from 40% and a high band from 65%, this lands in the medium band.

Common mistakes

Averaging away a serious factor
Use the single-factor escalation level for items such as integrity concerns.
Setting bands after seeing the score
Agree weights and bands in the firm policy first.
Scoring without evidence
Use the comment column to note where each score comes from.

Frequently asked questions

Which factors should I use?+
Those in your firm quality management policy and the Code of Ethics. The sample is only a starting point.
Does it tell me whether to accept?+
No. It supports a documented decision by the right person.
Is my data uploaded?+
No. Everything runs in your browser.

Authoritative sources

ICAI — Standard on Quality Management (SQM 1) — Acceptance and continuance of client relationships and specific engagements. Check the current text.
Always confirm against the latest version of the source. Regulations evolve and amendments are common.
Related calculators
SQM 1 gap assessment →Audit risk scorer →Section 141 checker →
Share this tool
Last reviewed: 2026-10-17 · For informational purposes only — not professional advice.